Wednesday, May 11, 2016

The Little Guy from Who Knows Where Dominates NBA Basketball Again - Stephen Curry

.

Professional basketball in America is brutal and is dominated by physical monsters stretching over seven feet high.  It is no game for the innocent, for the puny, for the quiet and unassuming, for choir boys yet pound for pound and inch for inch there may be no better player in the history of basketball in America than Stephen Curry.


Curry is just 28 years old, stands just 6' 3", and weighs just 190 pounds yet his on court accomplishments are shattering historic records every time he takes the court.  The little man from who knows where who played college basketball where? defies definition and stereotype.


Stephen is all about family.


Stephen is all about the team.

No four letter words from this choir boy and he is the epitome of the perfect family man, father, and son. Curry just goes out and defies logic leaving fans, opponents, and the world in awe.  Here are two accounts of his latest achievements.


Stephen Curry wins MVP for second straight season
           
Marc Stein
ESPN Senior Writer
• Senior NBA writer for ESPN.com
• Began covering the NBA in 1993-94
• Also covered soccer, tennis and the Olympics

PORTLAND, Ore. -- Golden State Warriors guard Stephen Curry became the NBA's first unanimous Most Valuable Player on Tuesday, winning the award for a second straight season.

Curry, 28, swept all 131 first-place votes, including 130 from a panel of sportswriters and broadcasters and one from the Kia MVP fan vote. San Antonio Spurs forward Kawhi Leonard was second in the voting, followed by Cleveland Cavaliers forward LeBron James.


Editor's Picks

Before the season began, NBA GMs voted Steph Curry fifth likeliest to win MVP. But as his own GM says, Curry is now doing things we'll never forget.

"I never really set out to change the game. I never thought that would happen in my career," Curry said Tuesday as he accepted the trophy during a news conference in Oakland, California.

"What I wanted to do was be myself. ... I know it inspires the next generation. You can work every day to get better."

The Warriors returned home after Monday's Game 4 win in Portland, in which Curry had 40 points, including 17 in overtime.

"He wants it," coach Steve Kerr said. "There's no ulterior motive. He's constantly trying to improve with no agenda. ... This is incredibly improbable. But there's a reason this is happening."

Curry had been an overwhelming favorite to repeat as league MVP since the Warriors' record-setting 24-0 start to the season, which broke the previous record for best start to a season by nine wins. He also led the Warriors to a 73-9 mark, eclipsing the 1995-96 Chicago Bulls' 72-10 record as the winningest regular season in NBA history.

Shaquille O'Neal and James fell one vote shy of unanimous selection in 2000 and 2013, respectively. Curry joins Tom Brady (2010 NFL MVP) and Wayne Gretzky (1982 Hart Trophy winner) as the only unanimous MVPs in their respective leagues. There have been 17 unanimous MVPs in MLB history, most recently Bryce Harper, who was NL MVP last season.




Warriors guard Stephen Curry received all 131 first-place votes to become the first unanimous winner of the NBA's Most Valuable Player Award on Tuesday.

Curry is the first player in league history at any position to average 30 ‎points per game in less than 35 minutes per game over a full season. He is the first two-time MVP in franchise history, and Wilt Chamberlain (1959-60) is the only other Warriors winner.

"You make going to work every day, for me, a true joy," Warriors general manager Bob Myers said to Curry. "It's very hard not to like you. I find it impossible. ... We should all appreciate this, appreciate this time, appreciate this moment, because life is happening fast."

Curry made 402 3-pointers, shattering his single-season NBA record of 286, which he set last season. He also joined Steve Nash and his coach, Steve Kerr, as the only players in league history to shoot at least 50 percent from the floor, 45 percent from 3-point range and 90 percent from the line in a season.

"They're going to have more of a spotlight, and people are going to ask questions about whoever it is," Curry said about the scrutiny of being MVP. "When there are legends and people that I looked up to as a player -- as a young kid, as a basketball player -- Hall of Famers and guys that talk about our team, it means that obviously we're doing something good, so we keep doing it. I take it with a grain of salt."

Curry is the 11th player to win back-to-back MVP awards in the NBA's 70-season existence. James was the last to achieve that feat, with the Miami Heat in 2012 and 2013.

New England Patriots star quarterback Tom Brady, the only unanimous winner of The Associated Press NFL MVP award, congratulated Curry in an email to Comcast Sports New England Tuesday.

"He is such a dominant player and so much fun to watch," Brady said. "I grew up loving the Warriors and can't believe they are achieving the type of success now that they never did in the past. Steph is a huge part of that and I love how (Warriors executive) Jerry West helped build the team. I am a big fan of his also."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.


Remember the 6 players drafted ahead of 2-time NBA MVP Steph Curry?


 Updated May 11, 2016, 9:28am PDT

Ron Leuty Reporter
San Francisco Business Times

Who was this skinny guard out of Davidson, and why did the Golden State Warriors make him their first-round pick and the seventh overall?



Warriors fans could be excused for the grumbling following the 2009National Basketball Association draft. Stephen Curry had little to his résumé outside of being the son of former NBA star Dell Curry and setting the nets afire at Davidson. Sure, he was the NCAA scoring leader in his junior season — his last at Davidson — and he was a consensus first-team All-American pick. But … Davidson? The Southern Conference?

As Curry has shown, though, big things come in relatively little packages. (At 6-foot, 3-inches, he still is taller than most of us.) After Wednesday, he now has racked up two NBA Most Valuable Player awards — an NBA-first unanimous selection this season — led the Warriors to the franchise's first NBA championship in 40 years and elevated that with a record-setting, 73 wins this season.

For a franchise that over the past five seasons had used its first-round picks on Anthony Randolph (14th overall), Marco Belinelli (18th overall), Patrick O'Bryant (ninth overall), Ike Diogu (ninth overall) and Andris Biedrins (11th overall), Warriors fans could be excused for their skepticism.

Even then, Warriors fans wondered whether Curry could be an everyday player, and they booed Warriors co-owner Joe Lacob soon after he traded away once-beloved Monta Ellis to Milwaukee, picking up Andrew Bogut in return.

(Double click on video for full screen)


There's the intangible quality of character when franchises — and companies — build their teams. It goes beyond statistics.

"Your own mom didn't know you'd make it in the league," Warriors head coach Steve Kerr noted during Wednesday afternoon's MVP award ceremony at Oracle Arena in Oakland. "Now you've got a banner behind us, two of these trophies — this is incredibly improbable.

"What makes you special, Steph, is obviously you've got a lot of God-given talent, but it's the determination, it's the love of the game. There is no agenda. It's just 'I want to get better.' There is no agenda, and every day you come in and you work.

What that means to our coaching staff is our jobs are incredibly easy because you set a tone for the whole organization, and we've got a team full of guys who work and want to get better every day."

Five other teams passed on picking up Curry — Minnesota missed out twice (though one account has Dell Curry telling the Timberwolves that his son didn't want to go there) — and two of the first six picks are no longer in the NBA seven years later.

Yet, though Wednesday's ceremony was centered on Curry, he used the word "team" no less than 11 times.

As Warriors General Manager Bob Myers put it Wednesday, there is nothing fake about Curry.

"I tried to surround myself with people that push me, that motivate me, that keep me focused on the right things in this life," Curry said. "I have that on this stage right here. I have that in my family — and for that, I'm extremely blessed and extremely thankful for that. This is a crazy world, and to have that kind of guidance and motivation, it's definitely allowed me to do what I do on and off the court."

Ron covers biotech and sports business.
.    

Marvin Minsky of MIT - Co-creator of Artificial Intelligence - died this year

.

What do Albert Einstein, Isaac Asimov, Carl Sagan, Arthur C. Clark, and Stanley Kubrick have in common?  Sure they are the greatest scientific minds of the 20th century, except Kubrick.  But then he popularized modern science in the movies when he produced and released the revolutionary 2001 A Space Odyssey movie written by Clarke in 1968.

All were friends and associates of Marvin Minsky, the founder of The Media Lab and Artificial Intelligence from MIT.

I interviewed Minsky several times in 1986 and then became part of his Society of the Mind and attended his events including the time he had Arthur C. Clarke as guest.  To hear Minsky talk about the old days with his friends, all beyond genius in my book, was fascinating.

Thanks to a very dear friend of mine, Margaret Sanders, the daughter of Colonel Sanders of Kentucky Fried Chicken fame, I was able to get to know Marvin and his wife Gloria and have dinner at their house where he told endless stories of their early escapades.

Kubrick and Clarke

Marvin and friends enjoyed a slightly different lifestyle than most of us.  While I was playing sandlot baseball they were rewiring houses, inventing automatic lighting systems, and figuring out how to change the image of science fiction in the movies.  That was the reason Kubrick came to Minsky to solve the technical problems when making 2001 A Space Odyssey.

Sometimes the greatest accomplishments in life are the result of the most unusual sequence of events.  I was researching a story on Plato's book on the Lost Continent of Atlantis when I stumbled across information that Maggie Sanders, the oldest daughter of the Colonel and one who inspired him to originate the take out concept of fast food marketing, was connected to Atlantis.

She had financed expeditions to find evidence of the Lost World of Atlantis, and had discovered the massive roads and buildings in the ocean by Bimini.  I was in NYC at the time but much of my family was in Kentucky and my mother had just appeared as an extra in a movie and met Maggie Sanders.


I arranged to meet her and discovered she was deeply involve in the American Academy of Science and had met Einstein through her work with the Academy.  We became great friends and I would travel with her all over the country and learned of her amazing relationship with all these prominent scientists.

Maggie knew more Nobel prize winners than anyone I ever met and would suddenly hand me a phone when we were travelling to some event so I could interview one of them.  Two of her oldest friends were Marvin and his wife Gloria so of course when she found out I wanted to do stories about the Media Lab at MIT she arranged for us to go there and meet with Minsky.

From then on we attended the Society of the Mind gatherings.

Well here are the obituaries of Marvin Minsky.  My contribution to them might be that I found him to have a great sense of humor, he loved the camaraderie of his close friends, he enjoyed practical jokes, and he was living proof of the motto over the entrance to The MIT Media Lab, "We invent the future."

Marvin is now back with his gang of friends, Albert Einstein, Isaac Asimov, Carl Sagan, Arthur C. Clark, and Stanley Kubrick, and he has achieved the immortality he always expected to find.


MIT Media Lab News

Marvin Minsky, “father of artificial intelligence,” dies at 88

 

Professor emeritus was a co-founder of CSAIL and a founding member of the Media Lab.

MIT Media Lab 
January 25, 2016

Marvin Minsky, a mathematician, computer scientist, and pioneer in the field of artificial intelligence, died at Boston’s Brigham and Women’s Hospital on Sunday, Jan. 24, of a cerebral hemorrhage. He was 88.

Minsky, a professor emeritus at the MIT Media Lab, was a pioneering thinker and the foremost expert on the theory of artificial intelligence. His 1985 book “The Society of Mind” is considered a seminal exploration of intellectual structure and function, advancing understanding of the diversity of mechanisms interacting in intelligence and thought. Minsky’s last book, “The Emotion Machine: Commonsense Thinking, Artificial Intelligence, and the

Future of the Human Mind,” was published in 2006.

Minsky viewed the brain as a machine whose functioning can be studied and replicated in a computer — which would teach us, in turn, to better understand the human brain and higher-level mental functions: How might we endow machines with common sense — the knowledge humans acquire every day through experience? How, for example, do we teach a sophisticated computer that to drag an object on a string, you need to pull, not push — a concept easily mastered by a two-year-old child?

"Very few people produce seminal work in more than one field; Marvin Minksy was that caliber of genius," MIT President L. Rafael Reif says. "Subtract his contributions from MIT alone and the intellectual landscape would be unrecognizable: without CSAIL, without the Media Lab, without the study of artificial intelligence and without generations of his extraordinarily creative students and protégés. His curiosity was ravenous. His creativity was beyond measuring. We can only be grateful that he made his intellectual home at MIT.”

A native New Yorker, Minsky was born on Aug. 9, 1927, and entered Harvard University after returning from service in the U.S. Navy during World War II. After graduating from Harvard with honors in 1950, he attended Princeton University, receiving his PhD in mathematics in 1954. In 1951, his first year at Princeton, he built the first neural network simulator.


Minsky joined the faculty of MIT’s Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in 1958, and co-founded the Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (now the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory) the following year. At the AI Lab, he aimed to explore how to endow machines with human-like perception and intelligence. He created robotic hands that can manipulate objects, developed new programming frameworks, and wrote extensively about philosophical issues in artificial intelligence.

“Marvin Minsky helped create the vision of artificial intelligence as we know it today,” says CSAIL Director Daniela Rus, the Andrew and Erna Viterbi Professor in MIT’s Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. “The challenges he defined are still driving our quest for intelligent machines and inspiring researchers to push the boundaries in computer science.”

Minsky was convinced that humans will one day develop machines that rival our own intelligence. But frustrated by a shortage of both researchers and funding in recent years, he cautioned, “How long this takes will depend on how many people we have working on the right problems.”

In 1985, Minsky became a founding member of the MIT Media Lab, where he was named the Toshiba Professor of Media Arts and Sciences, and where he continued to teach and mentor until recently.

Professor Nicholas Negroponte, co-founder and chairman emeritus of the Media Lab, says: “Marvin talked in riddles that made perfect sense, were always profound and often so funny that you would find yourself laughing days later. His genius was so self-evident that it defined ‘awesome.’ The Lab bathed in his reflected light.”

In addition to his renown in artificial intelligence, Minsky was a gifted pianist — one of only a handful of people in the world who could improvise fugues, the polyphonic counterpoint that distinguish Western classical music. His influential 1981 paper “Music, Mind and Meaning” illuminated the connections between music, psychology, and the mind.

Other achievements include Minsky’s role as the inventor of the earliest confocal scanning microscope. He was also involved in the inventions of the first “turtle,” or cursor, for the LOGO programming language, with Seymour Papert, and the “Muse” synthesizer for musical variations, with Ed Fredkin.
Minsky received the world’s top honors for his pioneering work and mentoring role in the field of artificial intelligence, including the A.M. Turing Award — the highest honor in computer science — in 1969.


In addition to the Turing Award, Minsky received honors over the years including the Japan Prize; the Royal Society of Medicine’s Rank Prize (for Optoelectronics); the Optical Society of America’s R.W. Wood Prize; MIT’s James R. Killian Jr. Faculty Achievement Award; the Computer Pioneer Award from IEEE Computer Society; the Benjamin Franklin Medal; and, in 2014, the Dan David Foundation Prize for the Future of Time Dimension titled “Artificial Intelligence: The Digital Mind,” and the BBVA Group’s BBVA Foundation Frontiers of Knowledge Lifetime Achievement Award.

Minsky is survived by his wife, Gloria Rudisch Minsky, MD, and three children: Henry, Juliana, and Margaret Minsky. The family requests that memorial contributions be directed to the Marvin Minsky Foundation, which supports research in artificial intelligence, including support for graduate students.

A celebration of Minsky’s life will be held at the MIT Media Lab later this year.



The Washington Post

“The world has lost one of its greatest minds in science.” R.I.P. Marvin Minsky

January 26

Marvin Minsky, a legendary cognitive scientist who pioneered the field of artificial intelligence, died Sunday at the age of 88. His death was announced by Nicholas Negroponte, founder of the MIT Media Lab, who distributed an email to his colleagues:

With great great sadness, I have to report that Marvin Minsky died last night. The world has lost one of its greatest minds in science. As a founding faculty member of the Media Lab he brought equal measures of humour and deep thinking, always seeing the world differently. He taught us that the difficult is often easy, but the easy can be really hard.

In 1956, when the very idea of a computer was only a couple of decades old, Minsky attended a symposium at Dartmouth that is considered the founding event in the field of artificial intelligence. His 1960 paper, "Steps Toward Artificial Intelligence," laid out many of the routes that researchers would take in the decades to come. He founded the Artificial Intelligence lab at MIT, and wrote seminal books — including "The Society of Mind” and “The Emotion Machine” — that colleagues consider essential to understanding the challenges in creating machine intelligence.


You get a sense of his storied and varied career from his home page at MIT:

In 1951 he built the SNARC, the first neural network simulator. His other inventions include mechanical arms, hands and other robotic devices, the Confocal Scanning Microscope, the “Muse” synthesizer for musical variations (with E. Fredkin), and one of the first LOGO “turtles”. A member of the NAS, NAE and Argentine NAS, he has received the ACM Turing Award, the MIT Killian Award, the Japan Prize, the IJCAI Research Excellence Award, the Rank Prize and the Robert Wood Prize for Optoelectronics, and the Benjamin Franklin Medal.

One of his former students, Patrick Winston, now a professor at M.I.T., wrote a brief tribute to his friend and mentor:

Many years ago, when I was a student casting about for what I wanted to do, I wandered into one of Marvin's classes. Magic happened. I was awed and inspired. I left that class saying to myself, “I want to do what he does.”

M.I.T.'s obituary of Minsky explains some of the professor's critical insights into the challenge facing anyone trying to replicate or in some way match human intelligence within the constraints of a machine:
Minsky viewed the brain as a machine whose functioning can be studied and replicated in a computer — which would teach us, in turn, to better understand the human brain and higher-level mental functions: How might we endow machines with common sense — the knowledge humans acquire every day through experience? How, for example, do we teach a sophisticated computer that to drag an object on a string, you need to pull, not push — a concept easily mastered by a two-year-old child?
His field went through some hard times, but Minsky thrived. Although he was an inventor, his great contributions were theoretical insights into how the human mind operates.

In a letter nominating Minsky for an award, Prof. Winston described a core concept in Minsky's book "The Society of Mind": "[I]ntelligence emerges from the cooperative behavior of myriad little agents, no one of which is intelligent by itself." If a single word could encapsulate Minsky's professional career, Winston said in a phone interview Tuesday, it would be "multiplicities."

The word "intelligence," Minsky believed, was a "suitcase word," Winston said, because "you can stuff a lot of ideas into it.”

His colleagues knew Minsky as a man who was strikingly clever in conversation, with an ability to anticipate what others are thinking -- and then conjure up an even more intriguing variation on those thoughts.

Singularity Symposium

Who is Marvin Minsky?

Marvin Minsky is listed on Google Directory as one of the all time top six people in the field of artificial intelligence.

Isaac Asimov once described him as one of only two people he would admit were more intelligent than Asimov was (the other being Carl Sagan).

...Ray Kurzweil has referred to him as his mentor.

A philosopher and scientist, Marvin Lee Minsky was born in New York City on August 9, 1927, where he attended the Fieldston School and the Bronx High School of Science.
He served in the US Navy from 1944 to 1945 and received a BA from Harvard in 1950 and a PhD in mathematics from Princeton in 1954.

In 1959 Marvin Misky and John McCarthy founded what is now known as the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. He is currently the Toshiba Professor of Media Arts and Sciences, and Professor of electrical engineering and computer science.

Minsky was an adviser on the 1968 Stanley Kubrick classic science fiction movie 2001: A Space Odyssey and is referred to in both the movie and the book. He won the Turing Award in 1969, the Japan Prize in 1990, the IJCAI Award for Research Excellence in 1991, and the Benjamin Franklin Medal from the Franklin Institute in 2001.

Inventor and author, Minsky is universally regarded as one of the world's leading authorities in artificial intelligence who has made fundamental contributions to the fields of robotics and computer-aided learning technologies.

Some of his most notable books include The Society of Mind border=0 v:shapes="_x0000_i1025"> , Perceptrons v:shapes="_x0000_i1026"> (which he co-authored with Seymor Papert) and, most recently, The Emotion Machine.



Scientific American

The Many Minds of Marvin Minsky (R.I.P.)

The late Marvin Minsky, a pioneer of artificial intelligence, was a paradoxical figure, who once said Freud was his favorite theorist of mind.


By John Horgan on January 26, 2016
Marvin Minsky, a pioneer of artificial intelligence, died on Sunday, January 24, in Boston, according to The New York Times. He was 88. Minsky contributed two important articles to Scientific American: Artificial Intelligence, on his theories of multiple minds, and Will Robots Inherit The Earth?, on the future of AI. I profiled Minsky for Scientific American in 1993, after spending an afternoon with him at MIT’s Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, and again in The End of Science. Below is an edited version of the latter profile. -–John Horgan

Before I visited Marvin Minsky at MIT, colleagues warned me that he might be defensive, even hostile. If I did not want the interview cut short, I should not ask him too bluntly about the falling fortunes of artificial intelligence or of his own particular theories of the mind. A former associate pleaded with me not to take advantage of Minsky's penchant for outrageous utterances. "Ask him if he means it, and if he doesn't say it three times you shouldn't use it."

When I met Minsky, he was rather edgy, but the condition seemed congenital rather than acquired. He fidgeted ceaselessly, blinking, waggling his foot, pushing things about his desk. Unlike most scientific celebrities, he gave the impression of conceiving ideas and tropes from scratch rather than retrieving them whole from memory. He was often but not always incisive. "I'm rambling here," he muttered after a riff on verifying mind-models collapsed in a heap of sentence fragments.

Even his physical appearance had an improvisational air. His large, round head seemed entirely bald but was actually fringed by hairs as transparent as optical fibers. He wore a braided belt that supported, in addition to his pants, a belly pack and a tiny holster containing pliers with retractable jaws. With his paunch and vaguely Asian features, he resembled Buddha--Buddha reincarnated as a hyperactive hacker.


Minsky seemed unable--or unwilling--to inhabit any emotion for long. Early on, he lived up to his reputation as a curmudgeon and arch-reductionist. He expressed contempt for those who doubt computers can be conscious. Consciousness is a "trivial" issue, he said. "I've solved it, and I don't understand why people don't listen." Consciousness is merely a type of short-term memory, a "low-grade system for keeping records." In fact, computer programs such as LISP, which allow their processing steps to be retraced, are "extremely conscious," more so than we humans, with our pitifully shallow memory banks.

The only theorist of mind other than himself who truly grasped the mind's complexity was dead. "Freud has the best theories so far, next to mine, of what it takes to make a mind,” Minsky said.

Minsky derided Gerald Edelman's re-entrant-loops hypothesis as warmed-over feedback theory. Minsky even snubbed MIT's Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, which he had founded and where we happened to be meeting. "I don't consider this to be a serious research institution at the moment," he announced.

But as we wandered through the lab looking for a lecture on a chess-playing computer, a metamorphosis occurred. "Isn't the chess meeting supposed to be here?" Minsky asked a group of researchers chatting in a lounge. "That was yesterday," someone replied.
After asking about the chess talk, Minsky spun tales about the history of chess-playing programs. This mini-lecture evolved into a reminiscence of Minsky's late friend Isaac Asimov. Minsky said Asimov--who popularized the term "robot" and explored its metaphysical implications in his science fiction—declined to see robots at MIT, fearing that his imagination "would be weighed down by this boring realism."

One lounger, noticing that he and Minsky wore the same pliers, yanked his instrument from its holster and flicked its retractable jaws into place. "En garde," he said. Grinning, Minsky drew his pliers, and he and his challenger jabbed the tools at each other like punks in a knife fight.

Minsky expounded on the versatility and--an important point for him--drawbacks of the pliers; his pair pinched him during certain maneuvers. "Can you take it apart with itself?" someone asked. Everyone laughed at this allusion to a fundamental problem in robotics.

Returning to Minsky's office, we encountered a young, extremely pregnant Korean woman. She was a doctoral candidate scheduled for an oral exam the next day. "Are you nervous?" asked Minsky. "A little," she replied. "You shouldn't be," he said, and gently pressed his forehead against hers, as if seeking to infuse her with his strength.
I realized, watching this scene, that there are many Minskys.


But of course there would be. Multiplicity is central to Minsky's view of the mind. In his book The Society of Mind he contends that brains contain many different, highly specialized structures that evolved to solve different problems.

"We have many layers of networks of learning machines," he explained to me, "each of which has evolved to correct bugs or to adapt the other agencies to the problems of thinking." It is thus unlikely that the brain can be reduced to a particular set of principles or axioms, "because we're dealing with a real world instead of a mathematical one that is defined by axioms."

AI has not fulfilled its early promise because modern researchers have succumbed to "physics envy"--the desire to reduce the intricacies of the brain to simple formulae. "They are defining smaller and smaller subspecialties that they examine in more detail, but they're not open to doing things in a different way."

AI researchers have failed to heed Minsky’s message that the mind has many methods for coping with even a single, simple problem. For example, someone whose television set fails to work will probably first consider it to be a purely physical problem. He will check to see whether the television is properly programmed or whether the cord is plugged in. If that fails, the person may call a repairman, thus turning the problem from a physical one to a social one--how to find a repairman who can do the job quickly and cheaply.

"That's one lesson I can't get across” to AI researchers, Minsky said. "It seems to me that the problem the brain has more or less solved is how to organize different methods into working when the individual methods fail pretty often."

As Minsky continued speaking, his emphasis on multiplicity took on a metaphysical and even moral cast. He blamed the problems of his field--and of science in general--on what he called "the investment principle," which he defined as the tendency of humans to keep doing something that they have learned to do well rather than seeking new solutions.

Repetition, or, rather, single-mindedness, seemed to hold a kind of horror for Minsky. "If there's something you like very much," he asserted, "then you should regard this not as you feeling good but as a kind of brain cancer, because it means that some small part of your mind has figured out how to turn off all the other things."

Minsky has mastered many skills during his career--he is adept in mathematics, philosophy, physics, neuroscience, robotics and computer science and has even written several science-fiction novels—because he loves the "feeling of awkwardness" triggered by learning something hard. "It's so thrilling not to be able to do something. It's such a rare experience to treasure."

Minsky was a musical child prodigy until he decided that music is a soporific. "I think the reason people like music is to suppress thought--the wrong kinds of thought--not to produce it." Minsky occasionally composes "Bach-like things" on an electric piano in his office, but he tries to resist the impulse. "I had to kill the musician at some point," he said. "It comes back every now and then, and I hit it."

Minsky had no patience for those who claim the mind can never be fully understood. "Look, before Pasteur people said, 'Life is different. You can't explain it mechanically.' It's just the same thing." But a final theory of the mind, Minsky emphasized, will probably be extremely complex; after all, consider how long it would take to describe precisely all the components and workings of an automobile.

The truth of a final mind-model could be demonstrated in several ways. First, a machine based on the model's principles should be able to mimic human development. "The machine ought to be able to start as a baby and grow up by seeing movies and playing with things,” Minsky said. Moreover, as brain-imaging technology improves, scientists should be able to determine whether the neural processes in living humans corroborate the model.

"Once you get a [brain] scanner that has one angstrom resolution, then you could see every neuron in someone's brain. You watch this for 1,000 years and you say, Well, we know exactly what happens whenever this person says ‘blue.’ And people check this out for generations and the theory is sound. Nothing goes wrong, and that's the end of it."
If scientists achieve a final theory of mind, I asked, what frontiers will be left to explore?

"Why are you asking me this question?" Minsky growled. The concern that scientists will run out of things to do is "pitiful," he said. "There's plenty to do." We humans may well be approaching our limits as scientists, but we will soon create machines much smarter than us that can continue doing science.

But that would be machine science, not human science, I said.

"You're a racist, in other words," Minsky said, his great domed forehead purpling. I scanned his face for signs of irony, but found none. "I think the important thing for us is to grow," Minsky continued, "not to remain in our own present stupid state." We humans, he added, are just "dressed up chimpanzees." Our task is not to preserve present conditions but to evolve, and create beings smarter than us.    

When I asked what super-intelligent machines might be interested in, Minsky suggested, half-heartedly, that they might try to comprehend themselves as they kept evolving. He was more enthusiastic discussing the conversion of human psyches into digital avatars.

This technological advance would allow Minsky to indulge in dangerous pursuits, such as taking LSD or converting to a religious faith. "I regard religious experience as a very risky thing to do because it can destroy your brain in a rapid way. But if I had a backup copy..."

Minsky also wanted to know what Yo-Yo Ma, the great cellist, feels like when playing a concerto. But to my surprise, Minsky doubted whether such an experience is possible. To feel what Yo-Yo Ma feels as he plays, Minsky explained, he would have to possess all Yo-Yo Ma's memories. He would have to become Yo-Yo Ma.  But in becoming Yo-Yo Ma, Minsky would cease to be Minsky.

This was an extraordinary admission for Minsky to make, because it implied that the essence of each individual human might be irreducible and unknowable.

In spite of his reputation as a rabid reductionist, Minsky was an anti-reductionist. His revulsion toward single-mindedness, his fondness for Freud, his passion for learning and novelty--all these traits were those of a scientific romantic, for whom the quest mattered more than mere knowledge.

The views expressed are those of the author(s) and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.


New Technology

Marvin Minsky, the Man Who Built the First Artificial Brain, Dead at 88

​Minsky, an MIT professor, was the inventor of the first neural network, the first graphical headset, one of the first programmable robots, and so much more. 

Jan 26, 2016

Isaac Asimov, a scientist turned hard sci-fi writer, once remarked that the only people he ever felt overshadowed him in intelligence were Carl Sagan and Marvin Minsky. While the former is well known for his work popularizing astronomy, planetary science, and astrobiology, the other was a more obscure figure.

Minsky died on Sunday at age 88, suffering a cerebral hemorrhage. His work primarily involved artificial intelligence systems, writing some of the foundational texts of the discipline and building one of the first "artificial brains" in 1951.The Stochastic Neural-Analog Reinforcement Computer, or SNARC, was capable of machine learning at a time when most computers still ran on punchcards. He also created one of the first head-mounted graphical displays, a predecessor to today's inventions like the Oculus or Gear VR.

In 1954, he completed his dissertation at Princeton, writing "Neural Nets and the Brain Model Problem," tackling some of the machine learning theories to come. His work on neural nets continued even after they went out of fashion in computing, though they've seen a recent resurgence in popularity with the widespread availability of cloud computing. 

Minsky eventually made a home in 1958 at MIT as a math professor before founding the Artificial Intelligence Project and co-directing the Artificial Intelligence Lab from 1959 to 1974. He stayed at the university until recent years. He was the Toshiba Professor of Media Arts and Sciences from 1990 on.

A 1961 paper, "Steps Toward Artificial Intelligence," laid out the road map for machine learning, and is still considered one of the most important texts in artificial intelligence today. In books like Society of Mind, he delved into the inner workings of the human brain, and many of his writings tried to compare and contrast a human brain from the robotic brains to come, and even wrote a paper on how we might be able to make contact with alien civilizations some day in a productive fashion. 

Minsky skirted the line between theorist, inventor, and philosopher, working with delicate technological systems while staring firmly into the future of computing. Along with his early AI headseat and artificial brain, Minsky also invented scanning microscopes, synthesizers, robot arms, and early programmable toys. 
Source: MIT
.

Monday, May 09, 2016

Where are Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton when you need them? Extreme Radical Right Conservatives reject Trump and Republican Party

.

Threaten Independent candidate for Extremist Agenda

If only the good old days were here, you would find the Extreme Radical Right Wing Conservatives challenging a presidential candidate to a duel and there would be a 50-50 chance they would lose.


Of course back then it was the bad boy Burr who challenged Hamilton, a rising star in national politics, when Burr was Vice President and Hamilton was about to end Burr's political career.  Since dueling was illegal at the time, they moved it from New York to New Jersey where law enforcement has an entirely different meaning.


Hamilton deliberately missed Burr with his first shot, as Burr was up for re-election, because Hamilton already lost a son several years earlier in a duel and he did not want to shoot a sitting vice president.  It was a nice gesture but did not work out so well in the end because Burr thought otherwise and killed Hamilton.


Once Donald Trump secured the Republican nomination this past week, the first thing that happened was the self-proclaimed elite of the GOP establishment, those neocons who dominate the radio and television airwaves and control all the magazines and online super-conservative press, showed their true colors and it was not a pretty sight.


Convinced the American public is stupid and not capable of selecting a president, while ignoring the fact Trump is well on his way to shattering the record for most votes in a Republican primary campaign in history, they pouted, cried foul, and declared the radical right wing conservative philosophy was far more important than the Republican Party.


Are you kidding me?  This was the perfect example of ego, elitism, and intellectual constipation that Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders declared the enemy of our national interest.  In colonial terms, it was an act of treason.  In today's age it is merely the dying breath of an institutional dinosaur that considers itself the sole hope for the future of humankind.

What is a radical right wing Republican?


This is a minuscule group of beltway eggheads, whose only accomplishment since President Obama took office was the idiotic shutdown of the government.  Why idiotic, these self-proclaimed fiscal conservatives managed to cost the US economy between $12 and $24 billion before finally giving up and caving in.

In fact it was the only thing Senator Ted Cruz accomplished since he was elected to the Senate.


So who is it that anointed the radical right wing special interest as the spokesperson for the Republican Party?  No one as far as I can ascertain.  Fact is the Party of Lincoln is grounded in a very centrist view of government balancing the left against the right, liberalism and conservatism, and a strong central government versus state's rights.


The conservative movement became a self-proclaimed dominant force after the term of President Ronald Reagan, a hero they quote often, but whose philosophy of the role of government is not consistent with the radical right.  Reagan was once a Democrat, leader of the Hollywood Screen Actors Guild, and Governor of California, hardly the perfect credentials to lead the conservative cause.


Right wing conservatives consider the highlight of their influence to be when the federal budget was last balanced in the late 1990's, when the wars were launched in the early 2000's, and when Cruz shut down the government a couple of years ago.

Seems a pretty meager benefit for a period of nearly 36 years, since Reagan took over.  Fact is the increase in government spending and the national debt has exploded over the years in spite of the conservative efforts.  Of course, liberal spending during the same time-period has exploded even more.


How did they do balancing the budget and slashing the National debt?

Balancing the budget took place only when Bill Clinton was president so the conservatives can only claim partial credit.  The Bush years reflect the consequences of an aggressive worldwide war policy that did not have favorable results from a debt standpoint.

While Obama did start out with the recession, he promised to get us out of war, and that did not happen, so his liberal agenda helped drive the national debt up even further.  The cumulative result of all the political promises and wasteful spending by both parties will be a 21 trillion dollar debt when the next president takes office.

What can we expect this year?

As you listen to all the new political promises, ask yourself where the money comes from to pay for the campaign rhetoric.  Our economy is stagnate, so new jobs are the
only hope for digging ourselves out of the massive fissure we fell in to and which we stand to bequeath to our children.
    
Here are the facts, starting with the historical data on the national debt.


Here are the years since Reagan became president.  Note even the period when Bill Clinton balanced the federal budget, the national debt continued to increase.


At the same time the debt was increasing so was the annual federal budget.


Here is who owns our national debt and us.


Pay attention to our candidates, a millionaire and a billionaire, as they battle for the hearts and votes of middle class America, the silent majority.