With Bill and Hillary
Clinton continuing to soar in popularity in the minds of some Democrats,
although not in the eyes of liberal and progressive Democratic institutions
like The New York Times, Newsweek, and The Washington Post, the stunning
article today in The New York Times raises more questions.
The newspaper disclosure
about the manipulation of hundreds of millions of foreign dollars in the
Clinton Foundation while she was Secretary of State probably explains better
than any other explanation why Hillary erased tens of thousands of emails from
her personal server covering that period.
Of course, Clinton
apologists say it was just the Clintons being
the Clinton 's
and they are just targets of a Right Wing conspiracy. However, no one would label the Times or Post
right wing radicals.
Bill Clinton is almost
certainly the most popular person in American politics. A new NBC-Wall Street Journal poll showed
that 56 percent of people have a positive view of the former president while
just 26 percent hold a negative one. It
makes him more popular than his wife; 44 percent of Americans have a positive
view of Hillary Clinton while 36 percent have a negative one.
Most Clinton fans point to the lead Hillary holds
in the choice to be Democrat nominee for president, a number that wavers around
60%. Running against Joe Biden who has
not said he is in the race, nor campaigned, he sits at about 10% of the
Democrat votes, Clinton
has already lost 40% of the Democrats with no opposition.
People may be tired of the
Clinton love of
walking the tightrope when it comes to federal laws and regulations. Bill Clinton spent over $7 million on legal
fees to avoid impeachment and settlements for lawsuits against him by women.
Of course, he smoked pot
but did not inhale and had oral sex with an intern but did not actually have
sex, so one must adjust to the Clinton
definitions.
We are yet to open the
book on the changes Clinton
made in the twilight of his presidency, which may have directly led to the
collapse of our economy.
In addition, there is
Goldman Sachs and their relationship with both Clintons in bailing out his legal
expenses. They also arranged for
$500,000 speaker fees, and channeled tens of millions of foreign, and somewhat
illegal dollars, into the Clinton Foundation of which she was a director, even
while Secretary of State.
Did I mention their
relationship to former Goldman Sachs executive Rahm Emanuel, Clinton 's chief fundraiser, and Obama's Chief
of Staff?
You get the idea, if
Hillary runs unopposed as it now looks she may spend far more money defending
herself against the acts of her husband, their family foundation, the $200 plus
million dollars in their bank accounts, and their very strange relationship
with the richest people throughout the world, some from countries whose money
is banned.
Just what transpired to
lift the Clinton couple from being broke according to Hillary in 2000 when Bill left office millions of dollars of debt from legal fees and lawsuit settlements, to being
worth up to $200 million along with the assets of the Clinton Foundation 14 years later.
Most disappointing if I
were a Democrat is how they continually sucker in the progressive wing of the
party with promises of helping the little people, as they rocket up the ladder
of former politicians who got rich manipulating the power of government.
Not only are they the
classic politicians who have run Washington for far too long, but they
show no signs of stopping their efforts
to convert public service to personal gain.
Ironically, Obama seemed
to have been wary of the wily Clinton clan . The White House said when he made Hillary
Secretary of State she signed an agreement to publicly report all Clinton Foundation
sources of money, and she was subject to preserving a permanent email record of
all her dealings as Secretary. Both promises
seem to have been broken.
This might raise the
question did the Clinton 's
tell Obama they would support him in the elections if she became secretary of
State? It could be the appointment was a
bribe or a payoff but not being a right wing Republican I have no grounds to
pursue such an abuse of power.
Hillary's biggest fear
should be not having an opponent and having to spend the next 15 months before
the general election explaining the Clinton
actions over the past two decades.
.