Showing posts with label White. Show all posts
Showing posts with label White. Show all posts

Sunday, September 01, 2019

Maybe those Old White Men in the US Senate are not the enemy but the defenders of American principles and patriotism! Here is what the news media chooses to ignore in their rush to judgement!


Are old White men really incapable of knowing what is best for the people of America, all the people of America?


How about those who condemn old White men in the US Senate for lack of judgement, perhaps they should get their facts right before they start spewing reckless charges.


Okay, so their hatred may cloud their flamboyant charges, does that mean truth is obsolete to the far left?

The Resistance?
The Enemy of Resistance?

Anti-Trump forces and mischievous Democrats intent on running for president or ignoring the Constitution coined the negative phrase of the “twelve old White men” when debate and voting took place for the Supreme Court Justice nomination of Brett Cavanaugh.  The Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee were "twelve old White men."






They use it as if older, White, male members of the Senate are incapable of making decisions for anyone except, old White men one must presume.

The Resistance?
The Enemy of Resistance?


Some consider it a throwback to the early days of America when white men were the only people allowed to vote.  Most people conveniently forget, however, that early America was colonial rule by European countries.


There was no America nor Americans.  All land was controlled by European nations, with European appointed governors, and whatever voting rights were the law in Europe.



Although America was discovered in 1492 by the Europeans, and colonization was underway by 1608, also by the Europeans, until the US Constitution was finally ratified in 1789 America as nation did not even existed.
The Resistance?
The Enemy of Resistance?


It is a clever ruse and used constantly by Move On and many other special interest groups within the fringe of what used to be the Democratic party.  Some consider themselves progressives, others socialists, others anarchists and all seem to be members of the resistance, which translates to anti-Trump resistance.

The Resistance?

The Enemy of Resistance?

So, what about their claim “old White men” are not qualified to decide the future of the nation?  Well this is not the first time old White men have been required to determine the future of the nation and how did they fare in the past?

The Resistance?

 The Enemy of Resistance?


History of Old White Men in America


July 4, 1776 - Old White men approved the Declaration of Independence.

September 17, 1787 - Old White men adopted and signed the Constitution


December 15, 1791 – Old White men ratified the Bill of Rights as additions to the Constitution

The Resistance?

The Enemy of Resistance?

April 8, 1864 - Old White men in Senate pass the 13th Amendment abolishing slavery

June 8, 1866 – Old White men in Senate pass the 14th Amendment guaranteeing citizenship to all born or naturalized in the US and extending Bill of Rights protection

February 16, 1869 – Old White men in Senate passed 15th Amendment prohibiting the federal and state governments from denying a citizen the right to vote based on that citizen's "race, color, or previous condition of servitude"

The Resistance?

The Enemy of Resistance?

June 4, 1919 – Old White men pass the 19th Amendment prohibiting the states and the federal government from denying the right to vote to citizens of the United States on the basis of sex.

June 19, 1964 – Old White men in Senate passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964

August 4, 1965 - Old White men in the Senate passed the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

The Resistance?

The Enemy of Resistance?


I do not know about you, but it seems to me that time after time in our nation’s history “Old White men” in the Senate have stepped forward to correct serious injustices and inequalities.  People seem to be ignoring history when they condemn old White men and they seem to be contributing to the rabid polarization of society through their reckless hatred.


In spite of the media support of the resistance, those millions that support such idealism still are a very small fringe of the voting public.  As more people seek truth the number of supporters of such resistance are alienating the substantial number of men and women in America who do not believe those old White men are the enemy, but the protectors and defenders of equal rights and opportunity for all.


Sadly, a lot of very worthwhile causes for women and many other issues have been seduced by the resistance and hijacked by them.  In time they will find their own worthy causes lost in the hatred, polarity, and fantasy world of the resistance.  You see, good ideas respect all others, they do not trade in hatred and polarity.


Thanks to those old White men, and their protection of free speech, the resistance of today can now stand before the cameras and resist to their heart's content.


There are also quite a few White men, and women, along with fellow Americans of every race, who never grew to be old because they gave their lives to defend the right of others to freedom and free speech.


So, who are the many tentacles of the “resistance” movement intent on compromising our Constitution and polarizing our people, well they come in many sizes and shapes. 
     

You be the judge, not the media or the radical, left wing ideologue.


Remind people there are still Independents in America, there are still people who are in the middle of political polarization between liberals and conservatives, and there are still people who put the best interests of our cherished Republic over self-interest and self-preservation.   

Sunday, August 25, 2019

America - A Nation of Immigrants - The Real Story - Melting Pot of Humanity



Who are we?

I feel comfortable writing about America a nation of immigrants because I have spent over 50 years trying to help the indigenous Native Americans like the Hopi nation, who are the only people in our country who are not immigrants.

With the politics in Washington off the cliff, and the truth harder to find every day in the news media, I figured I could be a sort of voice in the wilderness explaining what most Americans think about immigrants.


I wrote this article for the benefit of those outside of America forced to turn to the news media for truth about the the USA  and immigration reform.  Here is  little history often overlooked.

Back when our Forefathers fought a war of independence against the most powerful empire in the world, the British, we were already debating the shape of things to come, in order to assure our freedom, and protect us from the threat of becoming an empire and exercising such control over a free people.


There are a few things I believe were of significant influence on the Founding Fathers, more than we like to acknowledge.  First, I accept that Divine Providence guided them in their deliberations and debate.  Second, the colonists of that time were far more educated than most people believe.  Third, they employed either oracles or psychics to see far into the future.

I believe the record since our Declaration of Independence 240 years ago is testament to the truth in what I say.  It would have taken the Hand of God to guide a bunch of farmers, aristocrats, religious fanatics, and outcasts from throughout the world with minimal money and certainly no army, to victory over the greatest empire in world history.


As for education, many Americans were self-taught while those with resources made extensive use of tutors.  Innovation, initiative, and creativity were necessary characteristics of those attempting to tame a wild land and create a civilization in a foreign world.

Now oracles, mediums, and psychics must have been available to help draft the framework of a Constitution that protected and preserved the United States through all the radical changes in world culture, religion, economy, war, and technology that would come in the not too distant future generations.


Beyond the foresight, the founding documents also had to correct the flaws in the system that existed at the time, such as slavery, in order to guarantee freedom and equality to everyone.  The goal of the Constitution was to provide a pathway to achieve the lofty promises contained in the document whether they existed at the time or not.

Three key items immediately come to mind in terms of lofty promises.  Of course, there was slavery, women's rights, and there was religious freedom.  At the time, slavery was legal, women had no rights, and religious freedom was non-existent though there were attempts to institute it in places like Maryland with little success.


The Constitution also had to make it clear that America would always be a nation of immigrants like no other nation in the world.  Just think of the incredible growth that took place in America.  In 1776, there were about 10 million people.  Only forty years later, in 1816, there were 41 million people, four times as many.  During the next millennial, by 1916, we grew to 102 million and one millennial later we have reached 325 million people, from 10 million to 325 million in just 240 years.

Today we have three million indigenous peoples, plus two million more indigenous of mixed race, so five million indigenous residents.  That means 98.5% of the population in America are immigrants or ancestors of immigrants.


The roots of Americans are vast.  Here is the diversity of Americans as of 2010 represented by the ancestral ethnic mix as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau.


American Ethnic Mix 2010

1.      49,206,934 Germans 
2.      41,284,752 Black or African Americans
3.      35,523,082 Irish
4.      31,789,483 Mexican 
5.      26,923,091 English 
6.      19,911,467 Americans
7.      17,558,598 Italian
8.      9,739,653 Polish
9.      9,136,092 French (except Basque)
10.  5,706,263 Scottish
11.  5,102,858 Scotch-Irish
12.  4,920,336 American Indian or Alaska Native
13.  4,810,511 Dutch
14.  4,607,774 Puerto Rican
15.  4,557,539 Norwegian
16.  4,211,644 Swedish
17.  3,245,080 Chinese (except Taiwanese) 
18.  3,060,143 Russian
19.  2,781,904 Asian Indian
20.  2,625,306 West Indian (except Hispanic groups)
21.  2,549,545 Filipino
22.  2,087,970 French Canadian
23.  1,888,383 Welsh
24.  1,764,374 Cuban
25.  1,733,778 Salvadoran
26.  1,620,637 Arab
27.  1,576,032 Vietnamese
28.  1,573,608 Czech
29.  1,511,926 Hungarian
30.  1,423,139 Portuguese
31.  1,422,567 Korean
32.  1,420,962 Danish
33.  1,414,551 Dominican (Dominican Republic)
34.  1,319,188 Greek


This is the percentage distribution of the top fifteen.

49,206,934
17.1%
45,284,752
14.6%
35,523,082
11.6%
31,789,483
10.9%
26,923,091
9.0%
19,911,467
6.7%
17,558,598
5.9%
9,739,653
3.0%
9,136,092
2.9%
5,706,263
1.9%
5,102,858
1.7%
4,920,336
1.6%
4,810,511
1.6%
4,607,774
1.5%
4,557,539
1.5%

  
Religious Denominations

Here is the diversity of Americans represented by their religious denomination beliefs.

Denomination name
Members
(thousands)
  1. The Roman Catholic Church
68,202
  1. Southern Baptist Convention
16,136
  1. United Methodist Church, The
7,679
  1. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, The
6,157
  1. Church of God in Christ, The
5,499
  1. National Baptist Convention, USA, Inc
5,197
  1. Evangelical Lutheran Church in America
4,274
  1. National Baptist Convention of America, Inc
3,500
  1. Assemblies of God
3,030
  1. Presbyterian Church (USA)
2,675
  1. African Methodist Episcopal Church
2,500
  1. National Missionary Baptist Convention of America
2,500
  1. Lutheran ChurchMissouri Synod (LCMS),
2,278
  1. Episcopal Church
1,951
  1. Pentecostal Assemblies of the World, Inc Churches of Christ 
1,800
  1. Churches of Christ
1,639
  1. Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America
1,500
  1. African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church
1,400
  1. American Baptist Churches in the USA
1,308
  1. Jehovah's Witnesses Baptist Bible Fellowship International
1,184
  1. Church of God
1,074
  1. Christian Churches and Churches of Christ
1,071
  1. Seventh-day Adventist Church
1,060
  1. United Church of Christ
1,058
  1. The Progressive National Baptist Convention, Inc
1,010

NOTE: Includes the self-reported membership of religious bodies with 650,000 or more as reported to the Yearbook of American and Canadian Churches. Groups may be excluded if they do not supply information. The data are not standardized so comparisons between groups are difficult. The definition of "church member" is determined by the religious body.
Source: 2012 Yearbook of American and Canadian Churches, National Council of Churches.


This is a more detailed breakdown of the same religious information.



Religions

Explore religious groups in the U.S. by tradition, family and denomination

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  • Non-Christian Faiths 5.9%
  • Jewish 1.9%
  • Muslim 0.9%
  • Buddhist 0.7%
  • Hindu 0.7%
  • Other World Religions 0.3%
  • Other Faiths 1.5%

Finally, here is an article discussing the Pew research polling on the political preference of the various religious denominations in the last (2012) presidential election.


FEBRUARY 23, 2016

U.S. religious groups and their political leanings

Mormons are the most heavily Republican-leaning religious group in the U.S., while a pair of major historically black Protestant denominations – the African Methodist Episcopal (AME) Church and the National Baptist Convention – are two of the most reliably Democratic groups, according to data from Pew Research Center’s 2014 Religious Landscape Study.

Seven-in-ten U.S. Mormons identify with the Republican Party or say they lean toward the GOP, compared with 19% who identify as or lean Democratic – a difference of 51 percentage points. That’s the biggest gap in favor of the GOP out of 30 religious groups we analyzed, which include Protestant denominations, other religious groups and three categories of people who are religiously unaffiliated.


At the other end of the spectrum, an overwhelming majority of members of the AME Church (92%) identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party, while just 4% say they favor the Republican Party (an 88-point gap). Similarly, 87% of members of the National Baptist Convention and 75% of members of the Church of God in Christ (another historically black denomination) identify as Democrats.

These patterns largely reflect data from exit polls during the 2012 general election. In that year, 95% of black Protestants said they voted for Democrat Barack Obama, while 78% of Mormons said they voted for Republican Mitt Romney, who also is a Mormon.



White evangelical Protestants also voted heavily Republican in 2012 (79% for Romney), which mirrors the leanings of many of the largest evangelical denominations. Members of the Church of the Nazarene are overwhelmingly likely to favor the GOP (63% Republican vs. 24% Democrat), as are the Southern Baptist Convention (64% vs. 26%) and the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod (59% vs. 27%), among other evangelical churches. (In our survey, members of these groups can be of any race or ethnicity, while exit polls report totals for white evangelicals in particular.)

Catholics are divided politically in our survey, just as they were in the 2012 election. While 37% say they favor the GOP, 44% identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party (and 19% say they do not lean either way). In the 2012 election, 50% of Catholics said they voted for Obama, while 48% voted for Romney.



Members of mainline Protestant churches look similar to Catholics in this regard. For example, 44% of members of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) identify as or lean Republican in the survey, compared with 47% who are Democrats or Democratic-leaning. United Methodists and Anglicans are slightly more likely than other mainline groups to say they are Republicans, while members of the United Church of Christ are more likely to be Democrats.

About seven-in-ten religiously unaffiliated voters (70%) and Jews (69%) voted for Obama in 2012. A similar share of Jews in our survey (64%) say they are Democrats, while all three subsets of religious “nones” (atheists, agnostics and those who say their religion is “nothing in particular”) lean in that direction as well.



Jehovah’s Witnesses, who are taught to remain politically neutral and abstain from voting, stand out for their overwhelming identification as independents who do not lean toward either party. Three-quarters of Jehovah’s Witnesses put themselves in that category.

.