Showing posts with label Princeton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Princeton. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

Marvin Minsky of MIT - Co-creator of Artificial Intelligence - died this year

.

What do Albert Einstein, Isaac Asimov, Carl Sagan, Arthur C. Clark, and Stanley Kubrick have in common?  Sure they are the greatest scientific minds of the 20th century, except Kubrick.  But then he popularized modern science in the movies when he produced and released the revolutionary 2001 A Space Odyssey movie written by Clarke in 1968.

All were friends and associates of Marvin Minsky, the founder of The Media Lab and Artificial Intelligence from MIT.

I interviewed Minsky several times in 1986 and then became part of his Society of the Mind and attended his events including the time he had Arthur C. Clarke as guest.  To hear Minsky talk about the old days with his friends, all beyond genius in my book, was fascinating.

Thanks to a very dear friend of mine, Margaret Sanders, the daughter of Colonel Sanders of Kentucky Fried Chicken fame, I was able to get to know Marvin and his wife Gloria and have dinner at their house where he told endless stories of their early escapades.

Kubrick and Clarke

Marvin and friends enjoyed a slightly different lifestyle than most of us.  While I was playing sandlot baseball they were rewiring houses, inventing automatic lighting systems, and figuring out how to change the image of science fiction in the movies.  That was the reason Kubrick came to Minsky to solve the technical problems when making 2001 A Space Odyssey.

Sometimes the greatest accomplishments in life are the result of the most unusual sequence of events.  I was researching a story on Plato's book on the Lost Continent of Atlantis when I stumbled across information that Maggie Sanders, the oldest daughter of the Colonel and one who inspired him to originate the take out concept of fast food marketing, was connected to Atlantis.

She had financed expeditions to find evidence of the Lost World of Atlantis, and had discovered the massive roads and buildings in the ocean by Bimini.  I was in NYC at the time but much of my family was in Kentucky and my mother had just appeared as an extra in a movie and met Maggie Sanders.


I arranged to meet her and discovered she was deeply involve in the American Academy of Science and had met Einstein through her work with the Academy.  We became great friends and I would travel with her all over the country and learned of her amazing relationship with all these prominent scientists.

Maggie knew more Nobel prize winners than anyone I ever met and would suddenly hand me a phone when we were travelling to some event so I could interview one of them.  Two of her oldest friends were Marvin and his wife Gloria so of course when she found out I wanted to do stories about the Media Lab at MIT she arranged for us to go there and meet with Minsky.

From then on we attended the Society of the Mind gatherings.

Well here are the obituaries of Marvin Minsky.  My contribution to them might be that I found him to have a great sense of humor, he loved the camaraderie of his close friends, he enjoyed practical jokes, and he was living proof of the motto over the entrance to The MIT Media Lab, "We invent the future."

Marvin is now back with his gang of friends, Albert Einstein, Isaac Asimov, Carl Sagan, Arthur C. Clark, and Stanley Kubrick, and he has achieved the immortality he always expected to find.


MIT Media Lab News

Marvin Minsky, “father of artificial intelligence,” dies at 88

 

Professor emeritus was a co-founder of CSAIL and a founding member of the Media Lab.

MIT Media Lab 
January 25, 2016

Marvin Minsky, a mathematician, computer scientist, and pioneer in the field of artificial intelligence, died at Boston’s Brigham and Women’s Hospital on Sunday, Jan. 24, of a cerebral hemorrhage. He was 88.

Minsky, a professor emeritus at the MIT Media Lab, was a pioneering thinker and the foremost expert on the theory of artificial intelligence. His 1985 book “The Society of Mind” is considered a seminal exploration of intellectual structure and function, advancing understanding of the diversity of mechanisms interacting in intelligence and thought. Minsky’s last book, “The Emotion Machine: Commonsense Thinking, Artificial Intelligence, and the

Future of the Human Mind,” was published in 2006.

Minsky viewed the brain as a machine whose functioning can be studied and replicated in a computer — which would teach us, in turn, to better understand the human brain and higher-level mental functions: How might we endow machines with common sense — the knowledge humans acquire every day through experience? How, for example, do we teach a sophisticated computer that to drag an object on a string, you need to pull, not push — a concept easily mastered by a two-year-old child?

"Very few people produce seminal work in more than one field; Marvin Minksy was that caliber of genius," MIT President L. Rafael Reif says. "Subtract his contributions from MIT alone and the intellectual landscape would be unrecognizable: without CSAIL, without the Media Lab, without the study of artificial intelligence and without generations of his extraordinarily creative students and protégés. His curiosity was ravenous. His creativity was beyond measuring. We can only be grateful that he made his intellectual home at MIT.”

A native New Yorker, Minsky was born on Aug. 9, 1927, and entered Harvard University after returning from service in the U.S. Navy during World War II. After graduating from Harvard with honors in 1950, he attended Princeton University, receiving his PhD in mathematics in 1954. In 1951, his first year at Princeton, he built the first neural network simulator.


Minsky joined the faculty of MIT’s Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in 1958, and co-founded the Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (now the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory) the following year. At the AI Lab, he aimed to explore how to endow machines with human-like perception and intelligence. He created robotic hands that can manipulate objects, developed new programming frameworks, and wrote extensively about philosophical issues in artificial intelligence.

“Marvin Minsky helped create the vision of artificial intelligence as we know it today,” says CSAIL Director Daniela Rus, the Andrew and Erna Viterbi Professor in MIT’s Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. “The challenges he defined are still driving our quest for intelligent machines and inspiring researchers to push the boundaries in computer science.”

Minsky was convinced that humans will one day develop machines that rival our own intelligence. But frustrated by a shortage of both researchers and funding in recent years, he cautioned, “How long this takes will depend on how many people we have working on the right problems.”

In 1985, Minsky became a founding member of the MIT Media Lab, where he was named the Toshiba Professor of Media Arts and Sciences, and where he continued to teach and mentor until recently.

Professor Nicholas Negroponte, co-founder and chairman emeritus of the Media Lab, says: “Marvin talked in riddles that made perfect sense, were always profound and often so funny that you would find yourself laughing days later. His genius was so self-evident that it defined ‘awesome.’ The Lab bathed in his reflected light.”

In addition to his renown in artificial intelligence, Minsky was a gifted pianist — one of only a handful of people in the world who could improvise fugues, the polyphonic counterpoint that distinguish Western classical music. His influential 1981 paper “Music, Mind and Meaning” illuminated the connections between music, psychology, and the mind.

Other achievements include Minsky’s role as the inventor of the earliest confocal scanning microscope. He was also involved in the inventions of the first “turtle,” or cursor, for the LOGO programming language, with Seymour Papert, and the “Muse” synthesizer for musical variations, with Ed Fredkin.
Minsky received the world’s top honors for his pioneering work and mentoring role in the field of artificial intelligence, including the A.M. Turing Award — the highest honor in computer science — in 1969.


In addition to the Turing Award, Minsky received honors over the years including the Japan Prize; the Royal Society of Medicine’s Rank Prize (for Optoelectronics); the Optical Society of America’s R.W. Wood Prize; MIT’s James R. Killian Jr. Faculty Achievement Award; the Computer Pioneer Award from IEEE Computer Society; the Benjamin Franklin Medal; and, in 2014, the Dan David Foundation Prize for the Future of Time Dimension titled “Artificial Intelligence: The Digital Mind,” and the BBVA Group’s BBVA Foundation Frontiers of Knowledge Lifetime Achievement Award.

Minsky is survived by his wife, Gloria Rudisch Minsky, MD, and three children: Henry, Juliana, and Margaret Minsky. The family requests that memorial contributions be directed to the Marvin Minsky Foundation, which supports research in artificial intelligence, including support for graduate students.

A celebration of Minsky’s life will be held at the MIT Media Lab later this year.



The Washington Post

“The world has lost one of its greatest minds in science.” R.I.P. Marvin Minsky

January 26

Marvin Minsky, a legendary cognitive scientist who pioneered the field of artificial intelligence, died Sunday at the age of 88. His death was announced by Nicholas Negroponte, founder of the MIT Media Lab, who distributed an email to his colleagues:

With great great sadness, I have to report that Marvin Minsky died last night. The world has lost one of its greatest minds in science. As a founding faculty member of the Media Lab he brought equal measures of humour and deep thinking, always seeing the world differently. He taught us that the difficult is often easy, but the easy can be really hard.

In 1956, when the very idea of a computer was only a couple of decades old, Minsky attended a symposium at Dartmouth that is considered the founding event in the field of artificial intelligence. His 1960 paper, "Steps Toward Artificial Intelligence," laid out many of the routes that researchers would take in the decades to come. He founded the Artificial Intelligence lab at MIT, and wrote seminal books — including "The Society of Mind” and “The Emotion Machine” — that colleagues consider essential to understanding the challenges in creating machine intelligence.


You get a sense of his storied and varied career from his home page at MIT:

In 1951 he built the SNARC, the first neural network simulator. His other inventions include mechanical arms, hands and other robotic devices, the Confocal Scanning Microscope, the “Muse” synthesizer for musical variations (with E. Fredkin), and one of the first LOGO “turtles”. A member of the NAS, NAE and Argentine NAS, he has received the ACM Turing Award, the MIT Killian Award, the Japan Prize, the IJCAI Research Excellence Award, the Rank Prize and the Robert Wood Prize for Optoelectronics, and the Benjamin Franklin Medal.

One of his former students, Patrick Winston, now a professor at M.I.T., wrote a brief tribute to his friend and mentor:

Many years ago, when I was a student casting about for what I wanted to do, I wandered into one of Marvin's classes. Magic happened. I was awed and inspired. I left that class saying to myself, “I want to do what he does.”

M.I.T.'s obituary of Minsky explains some of the professor's critical insights into the challenge facing anyone trying to replicate or in some way match human intelligence within the constraints of a machine:
Minsky viewed the brain as a machine whose functioning can be studied and replicated in a computer — which would teach us, in turn, to better understand the human brain and higher-level mental functions: How might we endow machines with common sense — the knowledge humans acquire every day through experience? How, for example, do we teach a sophisticated computer that to drag an object on a string, you need to pull, not push — a concept easily mastered by a two-year-old child?
His field went through some hard times, but Minsky thrived. Although he was an inventor, his great contributions were theoretical insights into how the human mind operates.

In a letter nominating Minsky for an award, Prof. Winston described a core concept in Minsky's book "The Society of Mind": "[I]ntelligence emerges from the cooperative behavior of myriad little agents, no one of which is intelligent by itself." If a single word could encapsulate Minsky's professional career, Winston said in a phone interview Tuesday, it would be "multiplicities."

The word "intelligence," Minsky believed, was a "suitcase word," Winston said, because "you can stuff a lot of ideas into it.”

His colleagues knew Minsky as a man who was strikingly clever in conversation, with an ability to anticipate what others are thinking -- and then conjure up an even more intriguing variation on those thoughts.

Singularity Symposium

Who is Marvin Minsky?

Marvin Minsky is listed on Google Directory as one of the all time top six people in the field of artificial intelligence.

Isaac Asimov once described him as one of only two people he would admit were more intelligent than Asimov was (the other being Carl Sagan).

...Ray Kurzweil has referred to him as his mentor.

A philosopher and scientist, Marvin Lee Minsky was born in New York City on August 9, 1927, where he attended the Fieldston School and the Bronx High School of Science.
He served in the US Navy from 1944 to 1945 and received a BA from Harvard in 1950 and a PhD in mathematics from Princeton in 1954.

In 1959 Marvin Misky and John McCarthy founded what is now known as the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. He is currently the Toshiba Professor of Media Arts and Sciences, and Professor of electrical engineering and computer science.

Minsky was an adviser on the 1968 Stanley Kubrick classic science fiction movie 2001: A Space Odyssey and is referred to in both the movie and the book. He won the Turing Award in 1969, the Japan Prize in 1990, the IJCAI Award for Research Excellence in 1991, and the Benjamin Franklin Medal from the Franklin Institute in 2001.

Inventor and author, Minsky is universally regarded as one of the world's leading authorities in artificial intelligence who has made fundamental contributions to the fields of robotics and computer-aided learning technologies.

Some of his most notable books include The Society of Mind border=0 v:shapes="_x0000_i1025"> , Perceptrons v:shapes="_x0000_i1026"> (which he co-authored with Seymor Papert) and, most recently, The Emotion Machine.



Scientific American

The Many Minds of Marvin Minsky (R.I.P.)

The late Marvin Minsky, a pioneer of artificial intelligence, was a paradoxical figure, who once said Freud was his favorite theorist of mind.


By John Horgan on January 26, 2016
Marvin Minsky, a pioneer of artificial intelligence, died on Sunday, January 24, in Boston, according to The New York Times. He was 88. Minsky contributed two important articles to Scientific American: Artificial Intelligence, on his theories of multiple minds, and Will Robots Inherit The Earth?, on the future of AI. I profiled Minsky for Scientific American in 1993, after spending an afternoon with him at MIT’s Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, and again in The End of Science. Below is an edited version of the latter profile. -–John Horgan

Before I visited Marvin Minsky at MIT, colleagues warned me that he might be defensive, even hostile. If I did not want the interview cut short, I should not ask him too bluntly about the falling fortunes of artificial intelligence or of his own particular theories of the mind. A former associate pleaded with me not to take advantage of Minsky's penchant for outrageous utterances. "Ask him if he means it, and if he doesn't say it three times you shouldn't use it."

When I met Minsky, he was rather edgy, but the condition seemed congenital rather than acquired. He fidgeted ceaselessly, blinking, waggling his foot, pushing things about his desk. Unlike most scientific celebrities, he gave the impression of conceiving ideas and tropes from scratch rather than retrieving them whole from memory. He was often but not always incisive. "I'm rambling here," he muttered after a riff on verifying mind-models collapsed in a heap of sentence fragments.

Even his physical appearance had an improvisational air. His large, round head seemed entirely bald but was actually fringed by hairs as transparent as optical fibers. He wore a braided belt that supported, in addition to his pants, a belly pack and a tiny holster containing pliers with retractable jaws. With his paunch and vaguely Asian features, he resembled Buddha--Buddha reincarnated as a hyperactive hacker.


Minsky seemed unable--or unwilling--to inhabit any emotion for long. Early on, he lived up to his reputation as a curmudgeon and arch-reductionist. He expressed contempt for those who doubt computers can be conscious. Consciousness is a "trivial" issue, he said. "I've solved it, and I don't understand why people don't listen." Consciousness is merely a type of short-term memory, a "low-grade system for keeping records." In fact, computer programs such as LISP, which allow their processing steps to be retraced, are "extremely conscious," more so than we humans, with our pitifully shallow memory banks.

The only theorist of mind other than himself who truly grasped the mind's complexity was dead. "Freud has the best theories so far, next to mine, of what it takes to make a mind,” Minsky said.

Minsky derided Gerald Edelman's re-entrant-loops hypothesis as warmed-over feedback theory. Minsky even snubbed MIT's Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, which he had founded and where we happened to be meeting. "I don't consider this to be a serious research institution at the moment," he announced.

But as we wandered through the lab looking for a lecture on a chess-playing computer, a metamorphosis occurred. "Isn't the chess meeting supposed to be here?" Minsky asked a group of researchers chatting in a lounge. "That was yesterday," someone replied.
After asking about the chess talk, Minsky spun tales about the history of chess-playing programs. This mini-lecture evolved into a reminiscence of Minsky's late friend Isaac Asimov. Minsky said Asimov--who popularized the term "robot" and explored its metaphysical implications in his science fiction—declined to see robots at MIT, fearing that his imagination "would be weighed down by this boring realism."

One lounger, noticing that he and Minsky wore the same pliers, yanked his instrument from its holster and flicked its retractable jaws into place. "En garde," he said. Grinning, Minsky drew his pliers, and he and his challenger jabbed the tools at each other like punks in a knife fight.

Minsky expounded on the versatility and--an important point for him--drawbacks of the pliers; his pair pinched him during certain maneuvers. "Can you take it apart with itself?" someone asked. Everyone laughed at this allusion to a fundamental problem in robotics.

Returning to Minsky's office, we encountered a young, extremely pregnant Korean woman. She was a doctoral candidate scheduled for an oral exam the next day. "Are you nervous?" asked Minsky. "A little," she replied. "You shouldn't be," he said, and gently pressed his forehead against hers, as if seeking to infuse her with his strength.
I realized, watching this scene, that there are many Minskys.


But of course there would be. Multiplicity is central to Minsky's view of the mind. In his book The Society of Mind he contends that brains contain many different, highly specialized structures that evolved to solve different problems.

"We have many layers of networks of learning machines," he explained to me, "each of which has evolved to correct bugs or to adapt the other agencies to the problems of thinking." It is thus unlikely that the brain can be reduced to a particular set of principles or axioms, "because we're dealing with a real world instead of a mathematical one that is defined by axioms."

AI has not fulfilled its early promise because modern researchers have succumbed to "physics envy"--the desire to reduce the intricacies of the brain to simple formulae. "They are defining smaller and smaller subspecialties that they examine in more detail, but they're not open to doing things in a different way."

AI researchers have failed to heed Minsky’s message that the mind has many methods for coping with even a single, simple problem. For example, someone whose television set fails to work will probably first consider it to be a purely physical problem. He will check to see whether the television is properly programmed or whether the cord is plugged in. If that fails, the person may call a repairman, thus turning the problem from a physical one to a social one--how to find a repairman who can do the job quickly and cheaply.

"That's one lesson I can't get across” to AI researchers, Minsky said. "It seems to me that the problem the brain has more or less solved is how to organize different methods into working when the individual methods fail pretty often."

As Minsky continued speaking, his emphasis on multiplicity took on a metaphysical and even moral cast. He blamed the problems of his field--and of science in general--on what he called "the investment principle," which he defined as the tendency of humans to keep doing something that they have learned to do well rather than seeking new solutions.

Repetition, or, rather, single-mindedness, seemed to hold a kind of horror for Minsky. "If there's something you like very much," he asserted, "then you should regard this not as you feeling good but as a kind of brain cancer, because it means that some small part of your mind has figured out how to turn off all the other things."

Minsky has mastered many skills during his career--he is adept in mathematics, philosophy, physics, neuroscience, robotics and computer science and has even written several science-fiction novels—because he loves the "feeling of awkwardness" triggered by learning something hard. "It's so thrilling not to be able to do something. It's such a rare experience to treasure."

Minsky was a musical child prodigy until he decided that music is a soporific. "I think the reason people like music is to suppress thought--the wrong kinds of thought--not to produce it." Minsky occasionally composes "Bach-like things" on an electric piano in his office, but he tries to resist the impulse. "I had to kill the musician at some point," he said. "It comes back every now and then, and I hit it."

Minsky had no patience for those who claim the mind can never be fully understood. "Look, before Pasteur people said, 'Life is different. You can't explain it mechanically.' It's just the same thing." But a final theory of the mind, Minsky emphasized, will probably be extremely complex; after all, consider how long it would take to describe precisely all the components and workings of an automobile.

The truth of a final mind-model could be demonstrated in several ways. First, a machine based on the model's principles should be able to mimic human development. "The machine ought to be able to start as a baby and grow up by seeing movies and playing with things,” Minsky said. Moreover, as brain-imaging technology improves, scientists should be able to determine whether the neural processes in living humans corroborate the model.

"Once you get a [brain] scanner that has one angstrom resolution, then you could see every neuron in someone's brain. You watch this for 1,000 years and you say, Well, we know exactly what happens whenever this person says ‘blue.’ And people check this out for generations and the theory is sound. Nothing goes wrong, and that's the end of it."
If scientists achieve a final theory of mind, I asked, what frontiers will be left to explore?

"Why are you asking me this question?" Minsky growled. The concern that scientists will run out of things to do is "pitiful," he said. "There's plenty to do." We humans may well be approaching our limits as scientists, but we will soon create machines much smarter than us that can continue doing science.

But that would be machine science, not human science, I said.

"You're a racist, in other words," Minsky said, his great domed forehead purpling. I scanned his face for signs of irony, but found none. "I think the important thing for us is to grow," Minsky continued, "not to remain in our own present stupid state." We humans, he added, are just "dressed up chimpanzees." Our task is not to preserve present conditions but to evolve, and create beings smarter than us.    

When I asked what super-intelligent machines might be interested in, Minsky suggested, half-heartedly, that they might try to comprehend themselves as they kept evolving. He was more enthusiastic discussing the conversion of human psyches into digital avatars.

This technological advance would allow Minsky to indulge in dangerous pursuits, such as taking LSD or converting to a religious faith. "I regard religious experience as a very risky thing to do because it can destroy your brain in a rapid way. But if I had a backup copy..."

Minsky also wanted to know what Yo-Yo Ma, the great cellist, feels like when playing a concerto. But to my surprise, Minsky doubted whether such an experience is possible. To feel what Yo-Yo Ma feels as he plays, Minsky explained, he would have to possess all Yo-Yo Ma's memories. He would have to become Yo-Yo Ma.  But in becoming Yo-Yo Ma, Minsky would cease to be Minsky.

This was an extraordinary admission for Minsky to make, because it implied that the essence of each individual human might be irreducible and unknowable.

In spite of his reputation as a rabid reductionist, Minsky was an anti-reductionist. His revulsion toward single-mindedness, his fondness for Freud, his passion for learning and novelty--all these traits were those of a scientific romantic, for whom the quest mattered more than mere knowledge.

The views expressed are those of the author(s) and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.


New Technology

Marvin Minsky, the Man Who Built the First Artificial Brain, Dead at 88

​Minsky, an MIT professor, was the inventor of the first neural network, the first graphical headset, one of the first programmable robots, and so much more. 

Jan 26, 2016

Isaac Asimov, a scientist turned hard sci-fi writer, once remarked that the only people he ever felt overshadowed him in intelligence were Carl Sagan and Marvin Minsky. While the former is well known for his work popularizing astronomy, planetary science, and astrobiology, the other was a more obscure figure.

Minsky died on Sunday at age 88, suffering a cerebral hemorrhage. His work primarily involved artificial intelligence systems, writing some of the foundational texts of the discipline and building one of the first "artificial brains" in 1951.The Stochastic Neural-Analog Reinforcement Computer, or SNARC, was capable of machine learning at a time when most computers still ran on punchcards. He also created one of the first head-mounted graphical displays, a predecessor to today's inventions like the Oculus or Gear VR.

In 1954, he completed his dissertation at Princeton, writing "Neural Nets and the Brain Model Problem," tackling some of the machine learning theories to come. His work on neural nets continued even after they went out of fashion in computing, though they've seen a recent resurgence in popularity with the widespread availability of cloud computing. 

Minsky eventually made a home in 1958 at MIT as a math professor before founding the Artificial Intelligence Project and co-directing the Artificial Intelligence Lab from 1959 to 1974. He stayed at the university until recent years. He was the Toshiba Professor of Media Arts and Sciences from 1990 on.

A 1961 paper, "Steps Toward Artificial Intelligence," laid out the road map for machine learning, and is still considered one of the most important texts in artificial intelligence today. In books like Society of Mind, he delved into the inner workings of the human brain, and many of his writings tried to compare and contrast a human brain from the robotic brains to come, and even wrote a paper on how we might be able to make contact with alien civilizations some day in a productive fashion. 

Minsky skirted the line between theorist, inventor, and philosopher, working with delicate technological systems while staring firmly into the future of computing. Along with his early AI headseat and artificial brain, Minsky also invented scanning microscopes, synthesizers, robot arms, and early programmable toys. 
Source: MIT
.

Friday, July 12, 2013

No Chance for Hillary in 2016 - Yale & Harvard Streak will End

.

Now average Americans are going to have a hard time accepting this because average Americans consider the Ivy League to be something found in a the history books, or maybe in prose or fiction books.  The Great Gatsby comes to mind.
 
When it comes to power, the Ivy League is IT but normally in terms of the dominant Ivy influence over Wall Street, the international banking community and the engines of commerce.
 
 
Where did the following Latin phrases come from?
 
In Deo Speramus - (In God We Hope)
 
In lumine Tuo videbimus lumen - (In Thy light shall we see the light)
 
Quisquam qui ars  - (Any person -Any study)
 
Vox clamantis in deserto - (The voice of one crying in the wilderness)
Veritas -(Truth)
 
Dei sub numine viget - (Under God's power she flourishes)
 
Leges sine moribus vanae - (Laws without morals are useless)
 
Lux et veritas - (Light and truth)
 
Those are the mottos of the eight venerated Ivy League schools.
 
Brown
Columbia
Cornell
Dartmouth
Harvard
Princeton
Pennsylvania
Yale


It seems we understand the power and influence of the Ivy League in terms of commerce but we really don't when it comes to national politics.  In fact the attitude of the general public in terms of the Ivy League in politics is rather bleak.

According to the most recent Rasmussen polls only five percent (5%) of American Adults think it is better for America to have presidents only from Ivy League schools.  A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 85% believe it’s better for the country to have presidents who come from a variety of schools.


Try this!

There have been 43 men who served as US President as of 2008. It is often said that President Barack Obama is the 44th President of the United States of America. However, President Obama is only the 43rd different person to serve as President of the United States. This is due to the fact that President Grover Cleveland served non-consecutive terms and so is usually counted as both the 22nd and the 24th President.


Of our 43 presidents, 14 attended Ivy League schools.  Forbes magazine identified these additional political facts about the Ivy League.
 

 
All considered, more than a third of all U.S. presidents, Supreme Court justices and currently serving U.S. senators have attended an Ivy League school for undergraduate or graduate study.

It gets better.  When Obama completes his 2nd term in 2016 we will have had 28 straight years of presidents from Yale and Harvard alone under Bush 1, Clinton, Bush 2 and Obama.  In fact in the 224 years we have elected presidents, don't forget George Washington first took office in 1789, the Ivy League has held the presidency 82 of those years, or 37% of our history.


Hillary would be the 15th president from the Ivy League and that may be a bit too much for a nation in the which Ivy League represents just 8 out of 4,140 institutions of higher education.  For those of you into decimals the Ivy League makes up under 2 tenths of one percent (.001932) of our institutions yet controlled the presidency 37% of the time.

Public 4-year institutions     629
Private 4-year institutions 1,845
Total 4 year                           2,474

Public 2-year institutions   1,070
Private 2-year institutions    596
Total 2 year                           1,666

Total 4 & 2 year                    4,140


So money talks and legacy institutions prosper but you may be surprised when it comes to the costliest universities in America, long thought to be dominated by the Ivy League.

A recently compiled list of the 20 Most Expensive Colleges in the country shows prices, which include Tuition and Fees and Room and Board, range from $59,400 to just under $62,000 per year.

#1 New York University $61,977
#2 Harvey Mudd College $61,760
#3 Bard College $61,446
#4 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute $60,779
#5 Sarah Lawrence College $60,656
#6 Wesleyan University $60,214
# 7 Dartmouth College $60,201
#8 University of Chicago $60,039
#9 Bard College at Simon's Rock $60,003
#10 Trinity College $59,860
#11 John Hopkins University $59,802
#12 Fordham College $59,802
#13 Carnegie Mellon University $59,632
#14 University of Southern California $59,615
#15 Occidental College $59,592
#16 Scripps College $59,570
#17 Oberlin College $59,474
#18 Haverford College $59,416
# 19 Pitzer College $59,416
# 20 Northwestern University $59,389

Sources: Business Insider and U.S. Department of Education


To my amazement only one Ivy League school, Dartmouth, made the list.

What does this all mean?  It seems the more other schools catch up with the Ivy League in terms of the number of schools and the cost of education, the stronger those dastardly Ivy League schools get control of our presidency and political processes.

Harvard was the first university in America founded in 1636.  By 1800 six of the first 16 universities in America were Ivy League, 37%.  Now the Ivy League represents less than 1 percent of institutions of higher education.  In spite of that we are completing 28 straight years of presidents from just Yale and Harvard and along comes Hillary seeking to extend that Ivy stranglehold on the presidency to 36 straight years.


Isn't it about time we give someone else a chance like MIT or Stanford or Slippery Rock or even The Pennsylvania State University New Kensington Campus of the Commonwealth College, (the longest college name in the USA)?

To be perfectly honest, I set out in life intending to go to Yale for undergraduate work and Harvard for law school.  Even back in the 1960's it took two years to get through the process of screening.  When I visited Yale in the spring of 1964 I found out they had no athletic scholarships thus ending my Ivy League career.  I would have been classmates with Bush, Jr. and Bill Clinton, along with Hillary.






But in spite of my Ivy loyalty even I think enough is enough, give someone else a chance to lead us.  Besides, since she is now making $200,000 per speech, more than her annual salary as Secretary of State, she will be seduced by the money.

How is this for a dilemma?  Do I become president at $400,000 a year and spend 24/7 365 days a year tearing out my hair and getting fat at political dinners, or do I work two days and make the same amount without all the BS.

Ivy League Fashions

Besides, Bill Clinton showed us the way with his $100 million in earnings the few years after he was president.  Same with Gore and a host of other politicians.  Why would Hillary want any less?

The only glass ceiling she needs to shatter is the one holding the millions of dollars she will be making.


When Secretary Of State, Hillary Clinton's annual salary was $186,600 making her the fourth highest paid government official in the United States behind the President ($400,000), the Vice President ($225,551) and Secretary of Treasury ($191,300).
.

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Obamaville, February 21 - Obama's Higher Education Dilemma

.

Life as an Ivy League Elitist from Harvard not Yale

The world is a strange place indeed.  A little over three years ago Barack Obama was sworn in as the eighth U.S. president to have graduated from Harvard University.  Thus he is faced with the suspicion of being an Ivy League elitist, aristocrat, privileged or whatever you may think of Harvard, this bastion of liberalism.

In all fairness, I spent several years going through the tests, stress, interviews, etc., while trying to get into Yale, another one of those Ivy League elitist schools, before finances stopped my dream and I went to the University of Arizona to play basketball.


But the Ivy League certainly has a right to seem conceited or arrogant, I mean every list of the top universities in the world shows about the same thing.  Here are the top five universities in the world.

1.  University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
2.  Harvard, University, United States
3.  Yale University, United States
4.  University College of London, United Kingdom
5.  Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States


The third Ivy League school in this story is Princeton from New Jersey and it ranks number ten in the world.  So these three schools are all in the top ten, and two of the top three universities in the world.  It is pretty impressive.

President Obama is a 1991 graduate of Harvard Law School. He joins former President George W. Bush (M.B.A. ’75) and Presidents John Adams, John Quincy Adams, Rutherford B. Hayes, Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and John F. Kennedy as Harvard graduates chosen to serve as the nation’s chief executive.


You don't hear a lot of talk from the eastern establishment about Bush being a Harvard graduate and he does seem a rather odd fit with the likes of John Kennedy and Franklin Roosevelt, not to mention the Adams family.

However, Obama also ended 20 straight years of Yale presidents from Bush senior to Bush junior.  The three straight presidents, Bush, Clinton and Bush, gave Yale three of their four presidents in our history.

Now some of you may wonder how Bush, Jr. could be the last Yale president and still count as a Harvard president.  That is a  real dilemma, explaining how George Bush, Jr. is the only president in our history who graduated from Harvard and Yale.  So he counts as both.  Once again you seldom hear eastern elitists talk about this fact.

Two Ivy League institutions with twelve presidents between them, not bad.  For purposes of discussion and as a matter of loyalty to New Jersey where I lived longer than any other place during my life, I must add Princeton University, the third major Ivy League school that has produced two more presidents.


So Harvard 8 (counting Bush), Yale 3 (not counting Bush) and Princeton 2 have produced a total of 13 of our 44 total US presidents.  It gets better.  Of the 44 presidents, ten never graduated from college, or as we say out east, from an institution of higher learning.

Ironically, leading the pack are the two most popular and beloved of all presidents, George Washington and Abraham Lincoln.  Neither attended any institution of higher learning and in Lincoln's case he only had one year of formal education at an institution of lower learning.

For education purposes, the rest of the presidents not graduating are Andrew Jackson, Martin Van Buren, William Henry Harrison, Zachary Taylor, Millard Fillmore, Andrew Johnson, Grover Cleveland and Harry S. Truman.

So for purposes of comparison, 10 of our 44 presidents did not graduate from college.  Of the remaining 34 graduates, 13 came from three Ivy League schools, Harvard, Yale and Princeton, meaning the remaining 21 presidents came from the 5,755 other institutions of higher learning in America.


Statistically speaking that means almost 40% of all our graduating presidents (34) came from the elite three Ivy League schools, Harvard, Yale and Princeton.  Nearly four out of every ten graduating presidents are from these three.

The second half of the 20th century has been even more dominated by the elite Ivy League schools.  Since Franklin Roosevelt and World War II there have been 13 presidents.  One did not graduate, Truman.  Seven of the remaining 12 were from Harvard or Yale with little old George Bush, Jr. again representing both.  That means 58% of our graduating presidents since WWII  came from Harvard or Yale.

I say when two schools can dominate the leadership of our nation about 60% of the time, then they must be the cause of our problems brought about by their presidents.  If you do such a good job of molding the minds of our youth, then accept responsibility for the consequences of those minds you so successfully molded.


Just kidding.  But it does raise a few questions.  Still, I would never hold the Ivy League responsible for the minds it molded.  Certainly not any more than I would hold the Nobel Peace Prize committee responsible for giving Harvard's Obama the Nobel Peace Prize and watch him triple the troops fighting in Afghanistan.

Then there is Mount Rushmore National Park.

In 1927 Congress authorized this epic sculpture featuring the faces of four exalted American presidents: George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Abraham Lincoln.  Two were dropouts (Washington and Lincoln), one from Harvard (Roosevelt) and one from William and Mary  (Jefferson).

Since this was before FDR and JFK, both Harvard grads, watch for a new Mount Rushmore East, maybe along the  Appalachian Mountains.  I prefer a site in the Montes Agricola mountains, an elongated range of mountains near the eastern edge of the central Oceanus Procellarum lunar mare.  It lies just to the northwest of a plateau containing the craters Herodotus and Aristarchus.  On the moon my friends.


Imagine that, a story about Harvard and no mention of Jeremy Lin.
.