Thursday, June 12, 2014

How to lose a war - Iraq again in flames 11 years after US Invasion

.


This is not Obama's year for foreign policy successes nor is it the legacy former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton wanted as the top Obama official when policy decisions were made to leave Iraq and Afghanistan.


Yet today, with lightning speed, the Sunni Al-Qaeda's uprising as it sweeps across Iraq and recaptures the very areas lost in the war presents the dark dilemma that everything America did from spending $2 trillion over 11 years and having almost 4,400 Americans die in Iraq and over 32,000 wounded, was for naught.

Two and one half years after American troops left, the current prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, a member of the Shia Muslim faction, wants the Americans to come back as his country crumbles around him.


The war has killed at least 134,000 Iraqi civilians and may have contributed to the deaths of as many as four times that number, according to the Costs of War Project by the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University.

When security forces, insurgents, journalists and humanitarian workers were included, the war's death toll rose to an estimated 176,000 to 189,000, the study said.



The report, the work of about 30 academics and experts, was published in advance of the 10th anniversary of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq on March 19, 2003.

What can we expect if Iraq falls to the Sunni Al-Qaeda uprising?  Mass murders, even genocide as the Sunni take revenge from the Shia.  A return to strict human rights violations as women will be stripped of all rights and children will be raised to be terrorists if the past is any indication.


The radical Sunni and Al-Qaeda coalition will be forming the largest geographic Sunni controlled area in the Mideast to include Syria, Iran and Iraq, and will be a direct threat to destroy the remaining American allies in the Middle East.  The Sunni can also be expected to wage war on the Christians remaining in the region and to threaten to obliterate Israel.


Newspaper headlines from around the world say it all.

U.S. aid 'spawning new breed of jihadists'


Fighting in North Iraq to Delay Return of Region Oil Exports

Timeline - How al-Qaeda regained its hold in Iraq

A spent force five years ago, the Sunni militant group is now stronger than ever


After Mosul - If jihadists control Iraq, blame Nouri al-Maliki, not the United States.


Iraq: Al-Qaida-inspired militants capture Tikrit; 500,000 flee Mosul


Al-Qaeda's uprising in northern Iraq comes five years after had been all but defeated as a result of the US troop "surge". Former Telegraph Iraq correspondent charts the key points in its rebirth


2007-2008
After two years of Sunni-Shia civil war, US troops mount a "surge" designed to quell the violence. Among its strategies is turning Iraq's Sunni community against their former allies in al-Qaeda, with whom they had united to fight the US occupation and the US-backed, Shia-dominated Iraqi government. The strategy succeeds and al-Qaeda finds itself largely defeated in Iraq.

2010
New elections in Iraq sow the seeds of future disconent. Iraqiyya, a secular and religiously mixed bloc led by Ayad Allawi, a former British exile, win a narrow majority votes, but the Shia bloc run by current prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, wins power after forming a governing coalitiion with Iranian help. Rather than handing key security positions to his opponents as promised, Mr Maliki concentrates power in his own hands, alienating the Sunni community.

December 2011

Mr Maliki issues an arrest warrant for Tariq al-Hashemi, Iraq's Sunni vice-president, who flees abroad. The government claims Mr Hashemi has been using his bodyguards for terrorism campaigns, but Iraq's Sunnis see it as a sectarian smear campaign against his political rivals. Mr Maliki is also accused of replacing competent military leaders who had worked with the Americans with political cronies, undermining the military's strength at the very time when the US is pulling out its forces.

Autumn 2012
Belatedly inspired by the Arab Spring movements in neighbouring countries, Sunnis around Iraq begin a series of mass civil rights demonstrations, alleging that they are treated as second-class citizens by Mr Maliki's government. While their complaints get limited sympathy in the wider world - Sunnis, after all, enjoyed privileged lives during the reign of Saddam Hussein - Western diplomats in Baghdad concede that they have some grounds for complaint. In particular, the protesters allege harassment by the security forces and discrimination in getting government jobs.

December 2012
The arrest of Rafaie al-Esawi, a finance minister who is one of the last prominent Sunnis in government, galvanises the protests further. The growing sense of alienation with the government provides a ready source of new recruits to al-Qaeda, which has re-energised in western Iraq thanks to its campaign against President Bashar al-Assad in neighbouring Syria. While many Sunnis do not share al-Qaeda's extreme religious vision, they are willing to help it fight Mr Maliki's government.

April 2013
Iraqi government forces antagonise the Sunni community further when they attack a protest camp in the town of Hawijah in northern Iraq, killing 53 people. While the Iraqi government claims that the camp had become a haven for al-Qaeda militants, who had fired on them first, the raid on the camp prompts fighting that spills across northern Iraq. Gunmen briefly sieze one town from police and declare it to be "liberated" from government rule.

July 2013
The new joint Syrian-Iraqi al-Qaeda offshoot, known as the Islamic State of Iraq and al Shams (ISIS), gains a major coup when it breaks nearly 500 fellow militants from Abu Ghraib jail in Baghdad, supposedly the most secure jail in the country. Many rejoin their comrades' campaign.

December 2013
Human Rights Watch issues a report criticising the Iraqi government over the scale of its use of the death penalty, often in cases where confessions have been extracted by torture. A disproportionate number of those on death row appear to be Sunni insurgents.

January 2014
ISIS sends gunmen into the cities of Fallujah and Ramadi, west of Baghdad. The Iraqi army surrounds both cities but does not go for an all-out assault for fear of large civilian casaulties that would alienate locals still further. Five months later, both cities remain outside of Iraqi security forces' control.

June 2014
ISIS takes over the cities of Mosul and Tikrit, also threatening Baghdad. Five years from being all but vanquished, al-Qaeda's writ in Iraq is as strong, if not stronger, as it was before.
.   

America we've got a problem - Kids, guns & drugs, legal that is!!!

.

The shooting this week in an Oregon school marks the 74th shooting incident in schools in America since the Sandy Hook murder rampage just 18 months ago in Newtown, Connecticut.  When kids are injured or die there is understandably a much more passionate reaction than to the typical murders in America.


The media, politicians and shrinks all take to the airways whenever there is another incident, and at the current rate there is one a week.  Each week we get the gun control debate, the profiling and psychological analysis of the shooter, the grief for the victims, and White House reaction, more promises and then everyone goes home and does nothing.

74 School locations
However, in the course of reacting to the tragedies everyone seems to be caught up in the emotional frenzy and loses sight of the truth about what is happening.  I guess truth has little value when those raising Hell have no ability to do anything about the continuous stream of killings.

First the truth.

The worst shootings have taken place in the states with the toughest gun control laws in America.


Since 1993 murders by guns in America have declined drastically, in fact the rate of murder is about half of the 1993 rate.


Many of the weapons being used are illegal firearms.

More truth.

Percent of Youth Aged 4-17 Currently with ADHD Receiving Medication Treatment by State: National Survey of Children's Health
Most of the shooters, where the information was disclosed, had been or were on prescription drugs for depression, ADHD or other reasons.

All of these prescription drugs have a direct effect on the brain.

We have no idea what the long term impact of prescription drugs may be on our children.

When kids have more than 1 problem they may get multiple prescriptions for drugs and the cocktail effect when mixed has unknown impact on the brain.

Our addiction to drug prescriptions may very well be causing the increase in school shootings and killings.



In truth, our medical system and pharmaceutical greed may be destroying our kids mental and physical health faster than it destroyed our own health.

Did you ever wonder why no current reports on prescription drug use, the increase in drug use, and the deaths from legal drug use are available.  The most current analysis is four to five years old before it is made available.

Are prescriptions, problems and complications increasing at such a fast rate that critical information is now being withheld from the public?

If multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical corporations can report profits the first quarter of the next fiscal year, in other words within 90 days from when it happened, in order to maintain their lofty stock values, why can't they tell us how many more children are being given prescriptions of their drugs, how many died, and what other complications have been detected from extended use until 4-5 years later?

Politicians must make the giant pharmaceutical companies liable for all the long term damage they are doing to our kids minds with their prescriptions, cocktails and indifference.  And when kids on prescriptions are doing the shooting like they have been, then the same companies have to be liable for the victims deaths, treatment and consequences.

Do you think your elected representatives will support such a logical liability measure or will they continue to waive the liability for these companies like they have been doing all along for the same companies and banks and others?

What is more important to a politician - innocent school victims or corporate campaign money?  So far the money has trumped the kids.  So far our ignorance of the effect of drugs and drug cocktails is shameful.  So far our indifference in demanding change by our politicians is a disgrace but we can still do something about this before we have destroyed an entire generation.

America - we have really got a problem.... Our children's brains are being bombarded and possibly permanently altered by the prescription drugs we are pumping into them at record levels.

Here are some reasons why.



ADHD Medication


This past year, the utilization of medications to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) jumped 9.0%. With this increase, the United States now spends more on prescription drugs for Attention Disorders than it does for all but six other conditions.

Currently, an estimated 5.4 million U.S. children are diagnosed with ADHD. And with new guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics that now recommend physicians prescribe these medications to children as young as 4 (previous guidelines suggested a lower limit of age 6), the number of total diagnosed children is likely to grow.

Interestingly, the local impact of this national trend depends highly on where you live.

When looking only at Americans with commercial insurance, Express Scripts researchers found that children living in the South are 63% more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD than children living in western states. When broadening to all American children (including those on Medicaid and other government-sponsored plans where ADHD prevalence is higher), those living in a southern state have approximately a 1 in 9 chance of being diagnosed with this condition.  
 ------------------------------------------------

The American Psychiatric Association states in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) that 5% of children have ADHD.  However, studies in the US have estimated higher rates in community samples.

Recent surveys asked parents whether their child received an ADHD diagnosis from a health care provider. The results show that:

Approximately 11% of children 4-17 years of age (6.4 million) have been diagnosed with ADHD as of 2011.

The percentage of children with an ADHD diagnosis continues to increase, from 7.8% in 2003 to 9.5% in 2007 and to 11.0% in 2011.

Rates of ADHD diagnosis increased an average of 3% per year from 1997 to 2006 and an average of approximately 5% per year from 2003 to 2011.

Boys (13.2%) were more likely than girls (5.6%) to have ever been diagnosed with ADHD.

The average age of ADHD diagnosis was 7 years of age, but children reported by their parents as having more severe ADHD were diagnosed earlier.

Prevalence of ADHD diagnosis varied substantially by state, from a low of 5.6% in Nevada to a high of 18.7% in Kentucky.

Medication Treatment

Percent youth being treated for ADHD

Parents were also asked about whether their child was taking medication for ADHD. The results show that:

The prevalence of children 4-17 years of age taking ADHD medication increased from 4.8%  in 2007 to 6.1% in 2011

More US children were receiving ADHD treatment in 2011 compared to 2007; however, as many as 17.5% of children with current ADHD were not receiving either medication for ADHD or mental health counseling in 2011.

In 2011, geographic variability in the percent of children taking medication for ADHD ranged from a low of 2% in Nevada to a high of 10.4% in Louisiana.


Anti-depression Medication

In the US, almost 40% of people with mental health issues received treatment in 2012. But data from the US department of health also shows the types of treatments they received - from psychologists to prescription medication (including antidepressants).

Like other countries, the use of antidepressants in the US has soared. In 1998, 11.2 million Americans used these drugs. By 2010, it was 23.3 million. Despite that rise, expenditure on antidepressants has barely risen as the drugs have become cheaper – from $624 per person in 1998, to $651 in 2010.


According to a report released yesterday by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), the rate of antidepressant use in this country among teens and adults (people ages 12 and older) increased by almost 400% between 1988–1994 and 2005–2008.

The federal government’s health statisticians figure that about one in every 10 Americans takes an antidepressant. And by their reckoning, antidepressants were the third most common prescription medication taken by Americans in 2005–2008, the latest period during which the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) collected data on prescription drug use.

Here are a few other stand-out statistics from the report on antidepressants:

23% of women in their 40s and 50s take antidepressants, a higher percentage than any other group (by age or sex)

Women are 2½ times more likely to be taking an antidepressant than men (click here to read a May 2011 article in the Harvard Mental Health Letter about women and depression)

14% of non-Hispanic white people take antidepressants compared with just 4% of non-Hispanic blacks and 3% of Mexican Americans

Less than a third of Americans who are taking a single antidepressants (as opposed to two or more) have seen a mental health professional in the past year

Antidepressant use does not vary by income status




Drug
Time Period
8th Graders
10th Graders
12th Graders
Any Prescription Drug
Past Year
-
-
15.00
Amphetamine
Past Year
2.60
5.90
8.70
Adderall
Past Year
1.80
4.40
7.40
Ritalin
Past Year
1.10
1.80
2.30
Narcotics other than Heroin
Past Year
-
-
7.10
Vicodin
Past Year
1.40
4.60
[5.30]
OxyContin
Past Year
2.00
3.40
3.60
Tranquilizers
Past Year
1.80
3.70
4.60
Monitoring the Future Study: Trends in Prevalence of Various Drugs for 8th Graders, 10th Graders, and 12th Graders; 2013 (in percent)*
* Data in brackets indicate statist
Drug
Time Period
Ages 12 or Older
Ages 12 to 17
Ages 18 to 25
Ages 26 or Older
Psychotherapeutics (Nonmedical Use)
Lifetime
[20.90]
10.00
28.10
[21.00]

Past Year
[6.40]
6.60
[13.70]
[5.10]

Past Month
2.60
2.80
5.30
2.10
National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Trends in Prevalence of Psychotherapeutics (Nonmedical Use) for Ages 12 or Older, Ages 12 to 17, Ages 18 to 25, and Ages 26 or Older; 2012 (in percent)*
  
Type 2 Diabetes

Type 2 diabetes— long known to have an adverse effect on the brain— has now been linked with the loss of brain matter.

Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), researchers studied the brain structures of 614 patients with a mean age of 62, who had all been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for an average of 10 years. They found that long-term diabetes was associated with the greatest loss of brain tissue – suggesting brain atrophy.

“It’d been thought that most, if not all, of the effect of diabetes on the brain was due to vascular disease that diabetics get and, therefore, stroke,” lead study author Dr. R. Nick Bryan, professor emeritus of the department of radiology at the Perleman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, told FoxNews.com. “We found that in addition to that, there’s sort of diffuse loss of brain tissue, atrophy… we think may have a direct effect of the diabetes on the brain.”

Researchers noted that the greatest reduction of volume was seen in the brain’s gray matter, where the organ’s neurons are located.  The shrinkage of gray matter is often regarded as the start of the neurodegenerative process. Since patients with diabetes have been previously shown to have a higher risk of Alzheimer’s disease, the findings suggest cognitive changes may be related to neurodegeneration.

“[We’re] not saying all [people with diabetes] will get Alzheimer’s, but suggesting that many of them will have worse cognition and worse thinking ability as they get older and probably more of them will get neurodegeneration and Alzheimer’s, than non-Alzheimer’s patients,” Bryan said.

The findings suggest that for every 10 years of diabetes duration, the brain of a diabetes patient looks approximately two years older than that of a non-diabetic person – with regards to gray matter volume.

“One thing that’s pretty clear was that the adverse effect of diabetes was significantly worse in patients who had diabetes longer,” Bryan said.

Researchers point out that, for people with diabetes, proper care is a priority.

“[Patients] need to take the maximum effort to cooperate with physicians… to manage diabetes and blood sugars as well as they possibly can to try to decrease or prevent the damage of diabetes to the brain and ability to think later on in life,” he said. “[Diabetes] significantly affects all the organs in the body; the brain is one that is affected significantly perhaps in not just one, but two ways— not just vascular that we know about, but as a primary or direct assault on the brain.”


Legal Drugs for everyone 
    
About half of all Americans in 2007-2010 reported taking one or more prescription drugs in the past 30 days.  Use increased with age; 1 in 4 children took one or more prescription drugs in the past 30 days compared to 9 in 10 adults aged 65 and over.

Cardiovascular agents (used to treat high blood pressure, heart disease or kidney disease) and cholesterol-lowering drugs were two of the most commonly used classes of prescription drugs among adults aged 18-64 years and 65 and over in 2007-2010.  Nearly 18 percent (17.7) of adults aged 18-64 took at least one cardiovascular agent in the past 30 days.

The use of cholesterol-lowering drugs among those aged 18-64 has increased more than six-fold since 1988-1994, due in part to the introduction and acceptance of statin drugs to lower cholesterol.

Other commonly used prescription drugs among adults aged 18-64 years were analgesics to relieve pain and antidepressants.

The prescribing of antibiotics during medical visits for cold symptoms declined 39 percent between 1995-1996 and 2009-2010.

Among adults aged 65 and over, 70.2 percent took at least one cardiovascular agent and 46.7 percent took a cholesterol-lowering drug in the past 30 days in 2007-2010.  The use of cholesterol-lowering drugs in this age group has increased more than seven-fold since 1988-1994.

Other commonly used prescription drugs among those aged 65 and older included analgesics, blood thinners and diabetes medications.

In 2012, adults aged 18-64 years who were uninsured for all or part of the past year were more than four times as likely to report not getting needed prescription drugs due to cost as adults who were insured for the whole year (22.4 percent compared to 5.0 percent).

The use of antidepressants among adults aged 18 and over increased more than four-fold, from 2.4 percent to 10.8 percent between 1988-1994 and 2007-2010.

Drug poisoning deaths involving opioid analgesics among those aged 15 and over more than tripled in the past decade, from 1.9 deaths per 100,000 population in 1999-2000 to 6.6 in 2009-2010.

The annual growth in spending on retail prescription drugs slowed from 14.7 percent in 2001 to 2.9 percent in 2011.

---------------------------------------

The National Institute of Drug Abuse has some pretty shocking statistics detailing just how bad America’s addiction has become. For example:

the US, which holds 5 percent of the world’s population, is responsible for 75 percent of global prescription drug use;

52 million people over the age of 12 have used this medication for purposes outside of what they are intended for;

enough painkillers were prescribed in 2010 to medicate every American adult every four hours for a month;

over half of these pills are obtained for free from a friend or family member;

there are 5.1 million abusers of painkillers,

2.2 million who illegitimately take tranquilizers,

and 1.1 million needlessly popping stimulants.

---------------------------------------


ROCHESTER, MINN. Researchers find that nearly 70 percent of Americans are on at least one prescription drug, and more than half receive at least two prescriptions, reports CBS Atlanta.

Researchers from the Mayo Clinic, a non-profit medical and research center, report that antibiotics, antidepressants and painkiller opioids are the most common prescriptions given to Americans.

Twenty percent of U.S. patients were also found to be on five or more prescription medications.

Nearly one in four women ages 50 to 64 were found to be on an antidepressant, with 13 percent of the overall population also on antidepressants.

Seventeen percent of people in the study were being prescribed antibiotics, and 13 percent were on painkilling opioids.

As a whole, women and older adults received the most prescription drugs.

Antidepressants and opioids were most common among young and middle-aged adults.

The percentage of people who took at least one prescription drug in the past month increased from 44 percent in 1999-2000 to 48 percent in 2007-08, the Mayo Clinic reports.

Expenditures on prescription drugs reached $250 billion in 2009, and accounted for 12 percent of total personal health care expenditures.

According to the CDC, the percent of persons using at least one prescription drug in the past month increased nearly 50 percent between 2007 and 2010.

And the researchers said prescription drug spending will only increase in the future.


America - you have got a problem...
.

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Brazil World Cup - Starts Today - Go USA

.

Let the fun begin as the World Cup opens Today - Thursday.


Team USA is a mystery of sorts while Brazil is the favorite to win.


Check out Shakira and her contribution to the festivities.  Double click the image to go full screen.


Brazil will always win when it comes to beauty.


Here is the official 2014 World Cup theme We are One.  Double click the image to go full screen.

.